The film's premise is kind of like The Most Dangerous Game mixed with The Purge.
The Hunt is (or was) a satirical action/horror film about a group of poor people who get captured and hunted by a group of wealthy global elites.
The premise sounds kind of like The Most Dangerous Game mixed with The Purge, and it certainly falls under the bounds of "free speech."
Now, Imagine caring so much about free speech that anytime someone gets offended about anything, you shout, "No censorship! Freedom of speech gives me the right to say whatever I want!"
You love freedom of speech so much, in fact, that you've confused your First Amendment (freedom from government censorship) with exception from every other kind of censorship (censorship by private organizations and self-censorship). You've even decided that social consequences for your own actions, like someone else calling you racist, is an infringement upon your right to free speech. You are a true patriot, a Defender of Free Speech™.
Twitter (a private platform) banning specific conservatives (probably for hate speech)? Not on your watch.
Twitter will now censor Trump & other political figure’s tweets they consider “damaging” to the “health” of public… https://t.co/V58Dc7VvhN— Educating Liberals (@Educating Liberals)1561670466.0
Globalist censorship conspiracies? Definitely real.
The censorship against Conservatives will get worse towards the 2020 election. Social media is controlled by the s… https://t.co/4wQQiXyd7z— Educating Liberals (@Educating Liberals)1557018333.0
And then The Hunt comes along. Oh boy. To you, this "movie," if you can even call it that, is all about a group of liberal elites mercilessly slaughtering nice, good, salt-of-the-earth deplorables based solely on their opinions—just like Antifa (sorry, we tried to provide a link, but we don't have any actual sources to back this statement up)!
Universal is releasing a movie next month called “The Hunt” that depicts Trump supporters being hunted down like an… https://t.co/Tq7fbICRok— Educating Liberals (@Educating Liberals)1565220517.0
Sure, you haven't seen the actual movie. Nobody has, because it's not actually out yet. But Fox News seems to think it sounds dangerous, and if that's enough for Donald Trump to condemn it, that's enough for you to condemn it, too.
....to inflame and cause chaos. They create their own violence, and then try to blame others. They are the true Rac… https://t.co/r6f1K8zGkk— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump)1565376255.0
Thankfully, Universal listened to your outrage and pulled the movie. In light of all the recent mass shooting at the hands of right-wing domestic terrorists, Universal didn't want to stir the pot by releasing a movie where...deplorables were maybe in the protagonist role? Wait, what?
Regardless, it was their decision to pull the movie, and they seem to have settled on that even before Trump tweeted about it.
But this puts you in a weird position. On the one hand, you hate censorship no matter who is doing it. Otherwise, how could you be an official Defender of Free Speech™? But on the other hand, all the things you defend are being censored because of snowflakes.
The Hunt isn't being censored because of snowflakes though, not at all. It's being censored because it might possibly, maybe, somehow offend big, strong, proud, red-blooded, REAL Americans who are very afraid of being shot, especially by someone who's not a right-wing terrorist.
In that case, maybe censorship is good?
Maybe it's better just to go back to wondering why liberals want Medicare For All that doesn't include white people. Because that's what "All" means, right? Sorry, it's hard to function with a deep-fried brain like this one:
Dear libs, If the Dems want to give illegal immigrants free healthcare, & white people are illegal immigrants beca… https://t.co/RgJLxzUW6y— Educating Liberals (@Educating Liberals)1564539527.0
- Leica censored in China for ad that dramatizes the Tiananmen Square ›
- China censors ban Leica name over Tiananmen Square video ... ›
- Trump calls Hollywood 'racist' in scathing attack following ... ›
- Why Universal, in Canceling 'The Hunt,' Made the Right Call – Variety ›
- The Outrage Mob Wins: 'The Hunt' Getting Yanked is a Pro ... ›
- 'The Hunt' cancelled: Universal nixes plans for movie about 'elites ... ›
- Why the Controversial Thriller 'The Hunt' Was Cancelled Before Its ... ›
- Why The Hunt Was Cancelled (& Will It Ever Be Released) ›
- Universal's Cancellation Of Blumhouse's 'The Hunt' Is Morally ... ›
- 'The Hunt': Pro-Trump Movie Cancelled after Trump Criticism ... ›
- Studio says it will cancel release of 'The Hunt' after backlash | TheHill ›
- Universal Cancels 'The Hunt' Release – Variety ›
- The Hunt Movie Cancelled by Universal: Is It Worth the Controversy ... ›
- Everything to Know About the Canceled Movie 'The Hunt' | Time ›
- 'The Hunt' canceled by Universal following significant backlash | Fox ... ›
Breaking down the bias of comfort films.
With the constant onslaught of complicated news that 2020 has brought, sometimes you just want to be able to shut off your brain, relax, and feel happy.
Enter comfort films. These are the feel-good movies that feel like a warm hug when you finish them, the ones that allow you to escape for a short while. We often turn to these types of films in times of trouble or extreme stress, and when we're not sure what films of this nature we should watch, we turn to the Internet for options.
Rivera's "Glee" character was not just important, she was groundbreaking.
As a young queer girl growing up in the south, I was lucky that my parents weren't homophobes.
My parents believed that people were sometimes born gay, and while they wouldn't "wish that harder life" on their children, they certainly made me and my sister believe that gay people were just as worthy of love as anyone else. I was lucky.
Still, in my relatively sheltered world of Northern Virginia (a rich suburb near Washington D.C.), homophobia wasn't as blatant as hate crimes or shouted slurs, but it was generally accepted that being straight was, simply, better.
In high school, it wasn't uncommon to use "gay" as an insult or for girls to tease each other about being "lez." While many of us, if asked, would have said we were in support of gay marriage and loved The Ellen Show, being gay remained an undesirable affliction.
Even more insidious, I was instilled with the belief—by my church and my peers—that if gay and lesbian people could be straight, they would. But since they were simply incapable of attraction to the opposite sex or fitting into traditional gender roles, we should accept them as they are as an act of mercy. At the time, this kind of pity seemed progressive and noble. Those in my close circle of family and friends weren't openly dismissive or condemning of gay people, but we saw homosexuality as a clear predisposition with no gray areas.
Specifically: Gay men talked with a lilt, giggled femininely, and were interested in things that weren't traditionally "masculine." Meanwhile, gay women dressed like men, had no interest in makeup or other traditionally female interests, and probably had masculine bodies and features. In my mind, before someone came out as gay, they did everything in their power to "try to be straight" but were eventually forced to confront the difficult reality that they felt no attraction at all to the opposite sex. I viewed homosexuality not as a spectrum, but as a black and white biological predisposition that meant you were thoroughly, completely, and pitiably gay.
As a child, when I began to experience stirrings of attraction for other girls, I would reassure myself that not only had I definitely felt attraction for men in the past, but I also liked being pretty. I was a tomboy as a child, sure, but as I got older I recognized that my value was increased in the eyes of society if I tried to be a pretty girl. As it turned out, I even liked putting on clothes that made me feel good, I liked applying makeup, and I liked some traditionally "feminine" things. In my mind, this meant that I couldn't be gay, because gay women didn't like "girl" stuff.
As a teenager, I began to learn more about the difference between gender and sexuality, and the fluidity of both. I began to let myself feel some of the long-suppressed feelings of queer desire I still harbored.
Still, in the back of my mind, the instilled certainty of sexuality as an extremely rigid thing sometimes kept me up at night. What if I was gay? Would I have to change the way I looked? Would I have to give up some of the things I liked? In my mind, being gay meant your sexuality was your whole identity, and everything else about you disappeared beneath the weight of it.
But then, Santana came out as gay on Glee.
GLEE - The Santana 'Coming Out Scene' www.youtube.com
If you didn't watch Glee, than you might not know the importance of Naya Rivera's character to so many queer young women like myself. Santana was beautiful, she was popular, she had dated boys, she was feminine, she was sexy, and she was gay. There's even evidence that Santana had previously enjoyed relationships with men.
But the character came out anyways, not because she had to or because it was obvious to everyone around her that she was gay, but because her attraction to women was an aspect of her identity she was proud of. It wasn't an unfortunate reality she simply had to make the best of; it was an exciting, beautiful, aspect of her identity worth celebrating.
Before Santana, it had never really come home for me that being gay wasn't an entire identity—that it wasn't an affliction or disorder, but just another part of a person. She also didn't suddenly start wearing flannels or cutting her hair after coming out. She was the same feminine person she had always been. I had never realized that being a gay woman didn't have to look a certain way. Santana and Brittany's gay storyline showed two femme-presenting women in love, and for me, that was a revolution.
If it wasn't for Naya Rivera, we may never have had that important story line.
"It's up to writers, but I would love to represent [the LGBTQ community] because we know that there are tons of people who experience something like that and it's not comical for them in their lives," Rivera told E! News in 2011. "So I hope that maybe we can shed some light on that."
While Rivera herself wasn't gay (the importance of casting gay actors in gay roles is a separate conversation), she understood how important her character was to the queer community. "There are very few ethnic LGBT characters on television, so I am honored to represent them," Rivera told Latina magazine in 2013. "I love supporting this cause, but it's a big responsibility, and sometimes it's a lot of pressure on me."
Rivera wasn't just a supporter of the LGBTQ+ community on screen. In 2017, she wrote a "Love Letter to the LGBTQ Community" for Billboard's Pride Month. In it, she wrote, "We are all put on this earth to be a service to others and I am grateful that for some, my Cheerios ponytail and sassy sashays may have given a little light to someone somewhere, who may have needed it. To everyone whose heartfelt stories I have heard, or read I thank you for truly enriching my life."
Now, as we mourn the loss of Naya Rivera, at least we can take comfort in knowing that her legacy will live on—that the light her Cheerios ponytail and sassy sashays gave us won't go out any time soon.
Excuse me, I have to go weep-sing-along to Rivera's cover of landslide now.
Glee - Landslide (Full Performance + Scene) 2x15 youtu.be
- How Brittana On 'Glee' Made My Feelings For Women Finally Feel ... ›
- 'Glee's' Naya Rivera on Brittany and Santana's 'New Challenge ... ›
- 'Glee' Actor Naya Rivera's Body Recovered From California Lake ... ›
- Exclusive: 'Glee' Star Naya Rivera on Gay Rumors | Entertainment ... ›
- 'Glee' actress Naya Rivera's Santana comes out to applause - Los ... ›