The notoriously repressive Kingdom explained away its decision with the claim that women are just not “competitive enough".
Out of the 45 countries competing in the games—whose slogan is “Diversity Shines Here”—Saudi is the only one to not include athletes of both genders in its team. Not surprisingly, human rights groups have slammed the Arab state for its latest example of ongoing misogyny.
Human Rights Watch Director of Global Initiatives, Minky Worden, condemned the move, saying it is a step backward for Saudi Arabia, and admonished them for “shutting the door” on female athletes.
It follows hot on the heels of Saudi’s decision last month to not select any female athletes to compete at the Youth Olympics in China, despite have done so four years previously—where, flying in the face of their “not competitive” enough reasoning, Dalma Rushi Malhas won a bronze medal in the show jumping category.
It’s just another slap in the face for Saudi women, who, despite the Kingdom’s claim that in their culture, they “have their integrity and a special life” continue to be subjected to ongoing, unbelievable, levels of repression.
Popdust has compiled a list of restrictions that are enforced on women—who make up for 60% of all university graduates, yet only 18.6% of the workplace.
Cannot leave the country, or travel freely inside Saudi, without the permission of a male guardian or husband
Single women must receive the permission of the male head of the household, or male guardian, and married women must receive the permission of her husband in order to travel overseas. This also extends to women traveling inside the country, who must be able to produce written consent from a male guardian granting permission, if demanded.
Cannot wear anything they want in public (Duh!)
Women must abide by Saudi’s strict clothing rules that are rigorously enforced by the Muttawa (Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice department… AKA the religious Fashion Police.) Women must wear conservative and loose-fitting clothes when outside of their home, including a full-length cloak (abaya) a niqab (face veil, that allows only the eyes to be visible) and a hijab (head covering).
Cannot go anywhere in public without a male chaperone, who is related in some way, or approved of by a male guardian or husband
But, hey, guess what? Its actually NOT about repression, it’s actually for the woman’s own good! Because, in Saudi culture, allowing females to have any freedom of movement would make them “vulnerable to sins.” And, if a woman does dare to wander freely on her own, or with a man that is not a relative, she better beware—one teen learned that lesson the hard way after she and a male companion were kidnapped and she was gang raped by seven men. The victim, known as "the Girl of Qatif”, was sentenced to six months in jail and 90 lashes for “being alone with a man that is not a relative.”
Cannot try on clothes while shopping
Saudi stores rarely even have fitting rooms—given the fact that over 80% of women do not work, not surprisingly, the vast majority of retail workers are male. And it seems even the mere THOUGHT of a strange woman undressing in a room nearby would just be too much for these hot blooded men to handle.
Cannot open a bank account without the permission of a male guardian or husband
In order to open a bank account, a Saudi woman must be accompanied by her male guardian or husband, who also has to sign the papers on her behalf—a restriction made all the more ridiculous by the publication of a recent study, which claims the majority of family-run businesses in Saudi are owned by women. The report finds there are approximately 20,000 companies owned by women, ranging from retail to travel related businesses.
Cannot enter a restaurant without a male guardian or husband
Saudi eateries are strictly segregated, comprising of a “bachelor” room for men, and a “family” room for women, children and their husbands/male guardians—and, It probably comes a surprise to nobody, that the family room is usually of much lower quality and standards than that of the bachelor room. Women are also barred from waitressing at restaurants, aside from a small number of “women only” places.
Cannot invite unrelated men into their home if they are there alone
And, if they do, oh boy, they will learn never to do so again. Case in point, back in 2008, a 75-year-old woman made the grave mistake of allowing a delivery man to bring some bread into her home. Her punishment? Imprisonment and 40 lashes.
Cannot drive a car
Once again, this has nothing to do with repression..no, no, no! It’s for the woman’s own good! Despite there actually being no official law that bans female driving, religious beliefs prohibit it, with clerics arguing female drivers “undermine social values.” Oh, but that’s just the tip of the misogynistic iceberg—last year, after a number of brave women took to the roads to protest against the driving ban, one wise old fella named Sheikh Saleh al-Lohaidan, admonished them for their recklessness, claiming women drivers risk damaging their ovaries and subsequently giving birth to children with defects.
“If a woman drives a car, not out of pure necessity, that could have negative physiological impacts as functional and physiological medical studies show that it automatically affects the ovaries and pushes the pelvis upwards," he told the news website Sabq.org. "That is why we find those who regularly drive have children with clinical problems of varying degrees."
Adding further to the ridiculousness, many clerics also object to women being driven around by anyone who is not a direct relative. A fatwa was issued by the Royal Court and Ministry of Justice back in 2010, suggesting females should be made to give their breast milk to their employed drivers to drink, which would (bizarrely) then make them relatives and therefore trusted to be alone with them.
Cannot undergo a slew of medical procedures without consent from a male guardian or husband
Not surprisingly, the majority of the restricted medical procedures encompass those that are of a sexual nature, but can also include routine, or life saving surgery. In 2013, a hospital postponed the amputation of a critically injured woman’s hand as there was no male legal guardian to give permission for the procedure—her husband had just died in the same car accident that had caused her injuries.
Cannot enter a cemetery
Women are prohibited from entering cemeteries, even in the company of a male guardian—so are never able to attend burials, even if it is that of a child, parent or spouse. They’re also not allowed to visit the gravesite ever to pay their respects at a later date (although, in fairness, that’s actually a practice that’s not common in Saudi anyway, even for men)
Cannot buy or own a Barbie doll
The good old Muttawa banned the popular kids doll from Saudi Arabia back in 2003, claiming the “Jewish toy” presents a threat to morality and is offensive to Islam.
"Jewish Barbie dolls, with their revealing clothes and shameful postures, accessories and tools are a symbol of decadence to the perverted West. Let us beware of her dangers and be careful," they claim on their website.
Cannot marry without the permission of a male guardian
Although enforced marriage was officially outlawed in Saudi back in 2005, it's still a common practice—with girls as young as 8 being married to much older men, in return for money, favors, debt forgiveness. In a country that is so strongly segregated, many marriages are still arranged by a girl's parents, and—in theory—she has the right to refuse to wed, but in practice—that's rarely the case. In the situation where a female finds her own future spouse she must get the permission of her male guardian before being allowed to marry. This even extends to older women, which can often become farcical—as in the case of one elderly widow who had to seek the permission of her son before being allowed to remarry. On the other end, women can also be made to divorce against their will. One poor couple, who had been happily married for a number of years and had two children together, were forced to divorce after the woman’s half-brother was granted guardianship following the death of her father (who had previously given his permission for the marriage). The asshole half-sibling demanded the divorce be granted on grounds that the husband was from a lower tribe and had failed to disclose this fact at the time of marriage. Adding further to the travesty, after the woman refused to move into her half-brother’s home, for fear of domestic violence, she was forced to languish in jail for four years, along with her baby daughter, until the Supreme Judicial Council finally saw fit to overturn the divorce ruling.
Cannot read uncensored fashion magazines or books from overseas
Photos of women in books, magazines, and product packaging from overseas are heavily censored before being allowed to enter the country. Black markers are used to paint over any skin that may be showing in photos—all over a woman’s image in some cases, and often pages are just completely ripped out.
Cannot carry out any legal proceedings without taking SIX men along to testify to true identity
Under Saudi law a woman is required to have a total of six men swear for her in any legal proceedings, even when it comes to something as simple as buying or selling a property. When it comes to carrying out transactions in a government office or court, a woman is obligated to provide two male witnesses to testify to her identity, in addition to a further four men to swear that the first two are credible witnesses. Yep, really. Oh, and get this…a woman’s testimony in court is worth only half that of a man’s!
Cannot claim rape unless there are FOUR witnesses to testify to the attack
Under Sharia law, in order to prove she didn’t consent to sex, a woman has to provide four witnesses to back up her account of events. And if she’s raped by her own husband? Ha! Don’t be so silly! Under the same law, it is simply not possible for a woman’s husband to rape her, she's his property, to do with what he will. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of rapes go unreported, as, victims who are unable to prove they were violated, face the very real possibility of actually be convicted of fornication, and the punishment for extramarital sex is public whipping, or even stoning to death.
Cannot have legal parental authority over children
Under Saudi law, children belong to their father who has sole legal guardianship. In the case of divorce, a woman may sometimes be granted custody of her children, but only up until they turn age seven.
All in all, life for a woman in Saudi is far from a bed of roses, however, as is often the case, her level of freedom can vary drastically, depending on who she is, her financial wealth, connections, family standing and beliefs, etc.
And, there have been a few victories for women’s rights in the recent past. King Abdullah—who has been cautiously pressing for reform, but has to walk a fine line in a country where conservative clerics have such great power—opened the first ever fully integrated co-ed university in 2009, and appointed the country’s first female minister. Women are also now permitted to work in lingerie stores, as managers of factories and at supermarkets.
Then, in, 2012 Abdullah decreed women will be permitted to run as political candidates, and even allowed to vote, in the 2016 municipal elections—presumably though, only if they can persuade a male guardian to accompany them to the polling station.
Interestingly, there now remains just one country in the world that permits men to vote, but not women. It's that bastion of women's rights, the Vatican City.
The Trump-Twitter Industrial Complex continues to fester and mutate.
This week, President Donald J. Trump tweeted a false statement about mail-in ballots.
He wrote that secretaries of state were sending mail-in ballots to every person, when actually states are only sending out ballot applications. For the first time, Twitter jumped in to fact-check Trump's statement, adding a link to a webpage full of information about mail-in ballots.
- Calling Coronavirus "Boomer Remover" Is Twitter's Big New Meme ... ›
- Kirstie Alley's Tweets Are Everything Wrong with Politics - Popdust ›
- What Else Would Donald Trump Sharpie? #Sharpiegate - Popdust ›
- Whose WWIII? Black Twitter on U.S. History - Popdust ›
- How Chrissy Teigen Threatens Donald Trump - Popdust ›
- Who hacked the McDonald's Twitter to insult Donald Trump? - Popdust ›
Was the Jimmy Fallon Blackface Skit Intentionally Released as a Distraction from the Murder of George Floyd?
Racist police violence is a modern epidemic. So why are we talking about an SNL skit from 2000?
At this point, celebrity apologies are incredibly common. In 2020, it seems like some formerly beloved actor or TV personality is being put through the wringer of public opinion a few times a week.
Most recently, Twitter canceled Jimmy Fallon after an unquestionably racist skit from the 2000 season of SNL resurfaced online. The skit features Fallon impersonating Chris Rock, complete with black face and an offensive imitation of Rock's speech patterns.
Jimmy Fallon Blackface youtu.be
This quickly led to the hashtag #jimmyfallonisoverparty trending on Twitter. While fans seemed split on whether Fallon should be forgiven for the 20-year-old misstep, most everyone agreed that Fallon should apologize regardless. This morning, he did just that in the form of a tweet.
As far as celebrity apologies go, Fallon's is a pretty good one. He doesn't try to sidestep the blame, he doesn't bring up the fact that there were undoubtedly many, many other individuals involved in the creation of the skit, and he doesn't even mention the fact that in 2000, many people still thought it was possible for black face to be done in the spirit of fun, because the deeply racist nature of the act was largely ignored in mainstream (white) media. Of course, we know better now, and it's easy to see that a white person doing an exaggerated imitation of a black person—darkened skin included—can only be a racist, belittling act with a long, dark history of racial oppression. With that in mind, Fallon's only option was to apologize without caveat or reservation. Indeed, it's refreshing to see a celebrity apology that doesn't try to justify or minimize their own misstep. While we can all agree Fallon made a terrible, racist choice 20 years ago, we have to believe that, like all of us, he's grown since then. If cancel culture is to have any efficacy in making the world a better place, it has to leave room for forgiveness and growth. Hopefully, the whole affair will leave Fallon (and those who witnessed it) more racially sensitive.
All of that being said, one has to ask why the clip was brought up now, given that it's been circulated around the Internet before, and the specific YouTube clip that was shared was posted on the site over a year ago. It's also worth noting that the version of the clip that was going around Twitter has a text overlay that reads: "NBC FIRED MEGAN KELLY FOR MENTIONING BLACKFACE. JIMMY FALLON PERFORMED ON NBC IN BLACKFACE."
Megan Kelly, an outspoken conservative, was indeed fired from her job at NBC because she defended the use of blackface in Halloween costumes, saying on her talk show, "Truly, you do get in trouble if you are a white person who puts on blackface for Halloween, or a black person who put on whiteface for Halloween," she said. "When I was a kid, that was OK as long as you were dressing up as a character." While Fallon's instance of racial insensitivity was in 2000, Kelly defended blackface in 2019, long after society at large had begun to acknowledge the hurt that blackface and other forms of racial impersonation could cause. This fundamental difference aside, Kelly also has a long history of racial insensitivity that Fallon does not, even once saying, "What is the evidence that what happened to Eric Garner and what happened to Michael Brown has anything to do with race?" in a conversation about the epidemic of racist police officers in America.
Given the text overlay, it's pretty clear that whoever began the #jimmyfallonisoverparty was not necessarily seeking justice for the black community, but was instead trying to imply hypocrisy in the cancellation of Megan Kelly, given that Fallon (who has been outspoken about the flaws of the Trump administration and political pundits like Kelly) is still on the air. One even has to wonder if, given that it's obvious that the #jimmyfallonisoverparty trend was begun by a conservative individual or group, if the trend was meant to be a distraction from the widespread racist police violence that has been emphasized in recent weeks by incidents like the death of George Floyd, a black man who was murdered in Minneapolis by a white police officer on Monday. It seems oddly coincidental that the clip of Fallon should flood the Internet with controversy the day after Floyd's murder, unfortunately serving to help steer conversation away from Floyd's unjust death.
Indeed, under the unquestionably racist Donald Trump administration, more and more black people are being harassed, attacked, and murdered at the hands of racist white civilians and police officers. But Trump and his supporters don't want you to focus on that–so much so that it doesn't feel impossible that the Fallon skit was intentionally weaponized as a distraction.
In the last few weeks alone we learned that Ahmaud Arbery was murdered senselessly by a white man while simply out for a jog, and we all witnessed the harassment of Christian Cooper, a black man who was threatened by a white woman in Central Park who didn't want to put her dog on a leash. It's clear that racism in America cannot be reduced to insensitive skits from 20 years ago but is instead a current and deadly problem. What Jimmy Fallon did in 2000 was racist, yes; but don't let that distract you from the deadly consequences of racism in 2020, don't let celebrity apologies make you take your eyes of our lawmakers, who aren't doing enough to protect people of color in this country. Don't let the latest "#_____isoverparty" trend distract you from the deadly consequences of racism in our laws, culture, and criminal justice system.
- Jimmy Fallon "Canceled" on Twitter for SNL Blackface Sketch from ... ›
- George Zimmerman Got Punched In The Face—You Won't Believe ... ›