How does Kimmel's explanation of the Oscars debacle​ match up with reports?

Kimmel blames it on the envelopes while others call out the presenters, M. Night Shyamalan and evil alien scientists.


Moonlight won Best Picture at the 89th Academy Awards after the presenters incorrectly announced the winner as La La Land, the cast came onto the stage, and the producers made speeches. Then confusion and a bit of panic and finally, La La Land producer Jordan Horowitz took control of the mic and announced that, no, Moonlight was the winner.

Cue chaos. Cue Steve Harvey jokes. Cue conspiracy speculation.

Here's a play-by-play breakdown, courtesy of Slate:

Finally, last night, Oscars host Jimmy Kimmel used his monologue to explain his side of the story.

"I don't know if you know this, but I hosted the Oscars last night," he started. "Except for the end, it was a lot of fun." Kimmel threw in his share of jokes and tried to shift the blame away from any specific person (or presenter): "Whatever confusion there was about who won, Matt Damon lost."

"Clyde threw Bonnie under the bus," he said of the two presenters, Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway, who were chosen to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Bonnie and Clyde. It is hilarious that Beatty gave up trying to understand what was happening (he clearly knew something or everything was wrong) and handed the card to Dunaway for help. He was looking for verification but Dunaway made the announcement without catching any of his strange glances.

Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty

"You're impossible," she said to him when she thought he was stalling to build tension. But Peter Biskind, biographer of Warren Beatty, said that its just what you would expect from their relationship. He said that they didn't get along during the shooting of their famous film, and that "the fact that she kind of lost patience with him and basically grabbed the card and announced it is very much in keeping with their relationship." Was it a production mistake turned fiasco by the presenters' famously-strained relationship?

Or did M. Night Shyamalan write the ending, as he claimed in a tweet?

Based on his latest film, he might be a bit unjustified to claim such a shocking twist ending.

Probably the most surreal twist to this whole event would be proof of what the New Yorker's Adam Gopnik wrote about it: "that we are living in the Matrix, and something has gone wrong with the controllers."


Suddenly, Gopnik writes, recent events fall into a bizarre line: the shocking Presidential election, the unbelievable Super Bowl comeback, this weekend's Oscars mixup. Something has gone wrong with the simulation we call carbon-based life and existence in a collection of stars and planets known as the Universe.

NYU philosopher David Chalmers apparently originated the idea. Last year, Joshua Rothman cited a 2003 paper by the Oxford philosopher and futurologist Nick Bostrom as popularizing it. The theory says that humans (and, it follows, everything) are living in a computer simulation—think the Sims—that is controlled by an alien life form, a superior being. Our on, primitive versions of this include climate, economic and scientific models run by supercomputers.

The logic goes: there is still one real universe and beings in that universe have created numerous simulations. There are probably lots and lots of simulations, so the chances that we're living in one of those and not in the real universe are actually pretty high.

However, this "glitch" might be more than an accident. "There may be a Loki, a prankster, suddenly running it," Gopnik suggests. Was the Oscars mistake simply the latest example of malevolent behavior by an alien running experiments on us, its computer-generated subjects?

Kimmel's explanation seems a bit flimsy when faced with this possibility. Really? Two envelopes? A large team of professionals mixed up two envelopes after nearly one hundred years of not doing that?

My money's on the mad alien scientist.


Shedding light on the 'Moonlight' conspiracy

Was the 'Best Picture' flub a purposeful ploy by the Oscars?

[Editor's note: the opinions herein are solely of the author. Read at your own risk!]

In the elevator coming into work this morning, I was nestled among a group of women chatting conspiratorially about last night's epic Oscar flub. Though I myself didn't watch the snore-fest, I heard that Warren Beatty supposedly got the "wrong card" that claimed that La La Land had won the hearts of the Hollywood Foreign Press (who even are they?) when really, it was Moonlight. But, huzzah, viewers of these sorts of shows shouldn't be surprised, because the very same thing happened a few moons ago with Steve Harvey. Though that probably caused a few more tears and plates thrown.

Okay, so we know that it wasn't poor Beatty's fault, right? He was handed the "wrong card." But what really was this wrong card? We here at Popdust are cracking down on all things that smell fishy. Either there was some betrayed employee who wanted to make Beatty look bad, or this thing goes deeper.

The Oscars is about as American as apple pie, dating back to1929. You know the drill, the glamorous dresses, the 'how do you do's', the Ryan Seacreast. After many decades, it's pretty boring. But I think this whole thing is a ploy to get some more publicity for the worn-out, dried-out, and just plain boring award ceremony that has celebrities sucking up to each other in flamboyant displays of cheese. I love it best when the music cuts off their ridiculous speeches.

But this, alas, is nothing new. As I was reminded by a line in Andrew Lloyd Webber's adaptation of The Phantom of the Opera, when there is scandal at the opera, one of the opera managers sings (quite deviously), "Gossip's worth it's weight in gold."

Hey, and guess what? Steve Harvey never lost his job over announcing the wrong winner of the 2015 Miss Universe competition. He is doing just dandily. In fact, he's probably better off because of that mistake. Maybe that was a conspiracy, too!

It could have just been an innocent switcharoo, but I think nothing in Hollywood can be an innocent mistake. Henry VIII didn't "accidentally poison" anyone. Robespierre didn't "accidentally guillotine" anyone. Where there's a conspiracy to be had, Popdust is here to sniff it out.

Wanna find out who put the real hustle in American Hustle?

RockPaperPhoto has an amazing collection of fine artwork prints by famed photographer, Allan Tannenbaum, which perfectly encapsulate the glitz and glamor of 1970s New York—Popdust has selected our favorite shots.

While working as staff photographer for The SoHo News in the 70s, the New York nightlife scene was one of the staples of Tannenbaum’s photo beat—and throughout his tenure he captured all the greats of the era.

Jerry Hall, Bianca and Mick Jagger, John Travolta, Warren Beatty, Andy Warhol– and Studio 54 itself – were just some of the leading players whom Tannenbaum immortalized in film.

The 68-year-old’s body of work from his SoHo News days so perfectly captures the spirit and feeling of the times, Michael Wilkinson, the costume designer for American Hustle, credits Allan as being one of the driving influences behind the Oscar-nominated movie’s wardrobe.

Meanwhile, Tannenbaum’s photographic legacy far exceeds just the glitz and glamor of the heady Studio 54 days. After SoHo News closed its doors Allan joined Sygma Photo News Agency where he went on to cover major news stories such as the troubles in Northern Ireland, Operation Desert Storm in Kuwait and Iraq, the Rwandan refugee crisis and the Palestinian Intifada.

Tannenbaum has also photographed covers for Time and Newsweek and has had his photographs appear regularly in Time, Life, Rolling Stone, Paris Match and Stern.

Bianca Jagger and Mick Jagger by Allan Tannenbaum

Studio 54 by Allan Tannenbaum

Michelle Phillips & Warren Beatty by Allan Tannenbaum

Jerry Hall by Allan Tannenbaum

To see more amazing photos by Allan Tannenbaum and to buy fine art prints of his work head to RockPaperPhoto.