A look back at how much the Web confused people in the 1990s and what a disappointment it's been to its father.
On its 30th birthday, the World Wide Web has a lot to answer for.
From clickbait and "fake news" to YouTube rabbit holes and global porn addictions, the Internet has birthed over two billion websites and allowed millions of people to escape reality, if only for the duration of a short puppy video. While the Internet was born long ago from the mind sex of two software engineers (and not Al Gore), the ability to create web pages that share their data with any computer was first pitched by a software engineer in Switzerland named Tim Berners-Lee. In 1989, the Web was just a "vague, but exciting" idea he had. 30 years later, it's still vague and exciting, but with "furry" communities, young revolutionaries, and this cat all sharing the same web space.
Like any disappointed father, Berners-Lee hopes the Web will get its shit together and become what he always dreamed it'd be. In fact, for its 30th birthday, he wrote up a "contract" detailing how it can become a "public good" rather than a means of hacking, harassment, and hate speech. Berners-Lee wants to see the Web grow "from digital adolescence to a more mature, responsible, and inclusive future" by associating with fewer assholes and laying off the porn. On Tuesday, he gave the sort of patronizing, useless advice that any well-meaning father gives, "The Contract for the Web recognizes that whether humanity, in fact, is constructive or not actually depends on the way you write the code of the social network." Whatever that means, dad.
The truth is no one's ever been able to describe the Web accurately. In the 1990s, it was an absurd concept to introduce to people, and no one escaped puns on the term "Web-surfing" or cringey commercials with first generation special effects. Let's look back on people's struggles to understand the Web and all its behavioral problems.
1. This Scholastic book cover was just one of many examples that confused children about literally surfing the Web, because Back to the Future debuted in 1985 and had 90s kids waiting for their hoverboards.
2. Adults weren't spared from the "Web-surfing" confusion either, as this 90s TIME cover seems to depict a man who's been in a terrible accident involving his computer monitor and his hallucinations about CDs, convertibles, and a bottle of booze.
3. At least some explanations were useful. This VHS instructional video from 1997 featured four youths defining fraught terms like "chat lines" and "web pages" for kids (at one point, the most relatable child actor of the 90s asks, "What's a web page? Something ducks walk on?!"). It also gave step-by-step instructions on how to email your president. Too bad it doesn't explain what the fuck a VCR is.
The Kids' Guide to the Internet youtu.be
4. Thankfully, art is a universal language that helped explain the concepts of a URL address and how information lives in the sky.
5. Celebrities have always been ahead of the curve. Here Friends stars Jennifer Aniston and Matthew Perry show off their advanced knowledge of computers, the Web, and how to sacrifice your friends' souls to feed the Internet demons.
Happy 30th birthday, World Wide Web! Thanks for Reddit and breaking up with dial-up connections.
POP⚡DUST | Read More...
- As the Web Turns 30, Its Inventor Explains What Went Wrong | Fortune ›
- World Wide Web Turns 30, Netizens Celebrate With Hilarious Tweets ›
- Happy Birthday, Internet: The World Wide Web Turns 30 | News ... ›
- World wide web turns 30: Facts you didn't know - CBBC Newsround ›
- Save the date: World Wide Web turns 30 on March 12 – World Wide ... ›
- Google Doodle celebrates the 30th anniversary of the World Wide ... ›
- The World Wide Web Turns 30. Where Does It Go From Here ... ›
- World Wide Web turns 30: Designer laments its dark side | News | Al ... ›
The quarterback said "I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of America or our country." And then he tried to apologize. And only made it worse.
Drew Brees, a man who makes literally millions of dollars for throwing a ball, has come under fire for insensitive comments he made about NFL players kneeling during the National Anthem to protest police brutality.
"I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of America or our country," Brees said in the interview with Yahoo Finance. He clarified that this was in part because he envisioned his grandfathers, who fought in World War II, during the National Anthem. He continued, saying, "And is everything right with our country right now? No. It's not. We still have a long way to go. But I think what you do by standing there and showing respect to the flag with your hand over your heart, is it shows unity. It shows that we are all in this together. We can all do better. And that we are all part of the solution."
This isn't the first time Brees made it clear that he cares more for the idea of a make-believe unified America than he does for actual human lives. In 2016, he criticized Colin Kaepernick for kneeling during the anthem, saying it was "disrespectful to the American flag" and "an oxymoron" because the flag gave critics the right to speak out in the first place.
Colin Kaepernick kneeling in protest of racist police brutality
Of course, the flag's alleged ideals have been proven to only be applicable to wealthy, white men—men like Brees. Sure, his grandfathers did a noble thing when they fought under the US flag during WWII, and no one, including Kaepernick, has ever said that sacrifice isn't worth respecting. Thanks to the sacrifices of many people (including the enslaved Black backs upon which this country was built, including the scores of routinely abused Black soldiers who fought for American lives), America has offered opportunity and peace for many, many people. In particular, Ole' Glory has been very kind to men like Brees: rich, white men who still control the majority of the power and the wealth in the United States.
But what about the rest of us, Drew? What about George Floyd whose neck was crushed by a police officer who kneeled on him so casually that he didn't even take his hand out of his pocket? What about Ahmaud Arbery, who was shot for the crime of being Black and going for a jog? What about Breonna Taylor, a black woman who was murdered by police in her home in the middle of the night for a crime that had nothing to do with her? What about Tony McDade, Drew–have you heard his name? Have you heard about the 38-year-old Black trans man who was gunned down in Florida last week? Do you understand why these people's family's may harbor just a bit of disrespect for your precious flag?
Is it possible for you to realize, Drew, that your wish for "unity" is not a wish for progress, but a wish to maintain the status quo? When you call for unity under the American flag, you're talking about your flag, the flag that represents a long, sordid history of racial oppression and violence. There is no unity where there is no justice. When you say that "we are all in this together," what you're saying is that we all have roles to play in the version of society that has served you so well. For your part, you'll be a rich, white man, and for Black people's part, they'll continue to be victims of state-sanctioned murders– but hopefully more quietly, hopefully in a manner that doesn't make you uncomfortable?
When you say, "We can all do better. And that we are all part of the solution," what you mean to say is that POC and their allies are at fault. Sure, you probably agree that Derek Chauvin took it a bit too far, and you probably feel a little self-conscious that he's brought all this "Black rights" stuff up again. But when you say "all," you place blame on the victims who are dying under a broken system. And what, exactly, do you expect POC to do differently, Drew? Ahmaud Arbery was just out jogging, and still he died. George Floyd was just trying to pay a cashier, and still he died. POC and their allies try to peacefully protest by marching in the streets or taking a knee at a football game, and still white people condemn and criticize. Still the police shoot.
After much criticism, Brees did attempt an apology on Instagram, where he posted a hilariously corny stock photo of a Black and white hand clasped together. His caption, though possibly well-intentioned, made it even clearer that his understanding of the movement for Black lives is thoroughly lacking.
Highlights of the "apology" include his immediate attempt to exonerate himself from culpability, claiming that his words were misconstrued, saying of his previous statement: "Those words have become divisive and hurtful and have misled people into believing that somehow I am an enemy. This could not be further from the truth, and is not an accurate reflection of my heart or my character." Unfortunately, Drew, white people like you are the "enemy," as you put it, because by default you are at the very least part of the problem. No one is accusing you of being an overt racist, Drew; no one thinks you actively and consciously detest Black people. But your lack of empathy, your apathy, and your unwillingness to unlearn your own biases are precisely what has persisted in the hearts and minds of well-meaning white Americans for centuries.
Next, you say, "I recognize that I am part of the solution and can be a leader for the Black community in this movement." No, Drew. Just no. Black people don't need white people's savior complexes to interfere in their organizing; what they need is for us to shut up and listen. What they need is for us to get our knees off of their necks.
Finally, you say, "I have ALWAYS been an ally, never an enemy." This, Drew, is suspiciously similar to saying, "But I'm one of the good whites!" The fact of the matter is that feeling the need to prove your allyship is not about helping a movement; it's about feeding your own ego. Not only that, but your emphasis on "ALWAYS" does a pretty good job of making it clear that you don't think you have a racist bone in your body and that you have taken great offense at any accusations to the contrary. I have some news for you, Drew: Every white person is racist. Sure, the levels vary, and while you may not be actively and consciously discriminating against POC, you have been brought up in a racist system, and your implicit biases are as strong as any other white person's. Your job now is to unlearn those biases and confront those subtle prejudices in yourself and in other white people. Maybe the first step in doing so is just shutting your f*cking mouth about kneeling at football games. Maybe you should even consider taking a knee yourself.
For other non-BIPOC trying to be better allies, check out one of these 68+ anti-racism resources.
We're glad they're on our side.
The world is up against a seemingly insurmountable threat, but luckily, we've got a crack team of heroes on the case.
Sure, there's already the girl with super strength, the guy who can fly, and the anthropomorphic, trash-talking animal tailor-made for merchandise. But this is a threat of intergalactic proportions, and we're going to need all the help we can get if we want to survive.
- BTS Makes Being a Korean-American Adoptee (a Little) Easier ... ›
- The New BTS Single, 'Black Swan,' Is a Genuine Masterpiece ... ›
- The K-pop fans have sabotaged racist Twitter hashtags ›
- K-Pop Stans Are Spamming Racist Twitter Hashtags With Fancams ›
- K-Pop Stans Crash Dallas Police Department's iWatch App with ... ›
- Reply sections on Twitter are filled with K-pop videos. Here's why. ›
- K-pop stans spammed the iWatch Dallas police app with fancams ... ›
- K-Pop Stans Crashed Dallas Police App With Fan Cams ›
- K-Pop Fans Take Over #whitelivesmatter Hashtag, Drown Out Racist ... ›
- K-Pop Stans Continue to Take Over Racist Twitter Hashtags ›
- K-pop stans overwhelm app after police ask for images and videos ... ›
- K-pop stans are flooding right-wing and pro-police hashtags online ... ›