Culture Feature

"Death Stranding": The Thematic Beauty of a No-Fun Game

Why Death Stranding affected me more deeply than any other game I've ever played.

Kojima Productions

*MAJOR spoilers for Death Stranding follow.*

After clocking over 60 hours in Death Stranding, I can comfortably say that I had almost no fun playing any of it.

I can also say that, after nearly three decades of gaming, Death Stranding was one of the greatest, most revelatory video game experiences I've ever had. No, those two points are not contradictory. Allow me to explain.

A Game That Defies Its Medium

Death Stranding CliffKojima Productions

Movie buffs don't seek out The Deer Hunter because they expect to have fun watching it. Literary enthusiasts don't keep the Russian classics alive because they're amusing reads. Anime fans don't continually analyze Neon Genesis Evangelion because it's an enjoyable series. With every other artistic medium, audiences understand that while some works are meant to be fun, others are meant to be intellectually or emotionally challenging. But with video games, perhaps due to the interactive nature of the medium, fun still prevails as the loftiest goal in most people's minds—myself (usually) included.

When I think back on my favorite games over the past few years, Mario Odyssey stands out as one of the highlights. Odyssey is rich in creative level design, novel mechanics, and innovative gameplay that pays homage to everything gamers love about the Mario franchise while constantly keeping the experience fresh. Playing Odyssey makes you feel like a child who was just handed an overflowing toy box and given permission to go wild. I played it to 100% completion with a big, dumb grin on my face the entire time (with the exception of the jump rope minigame...damn you jump rope minigame). Of course, there's hardly any narrative beyond "Rescue Princess Peach!" but a Mario game would only get bogged down by anything else. The entire goal is to have fun playing. In a sense, Death Stranding is the polar opposite of Mario Odyssey.

But Death Stranding never presents itself as a traditional video game. Created by Metal Gear Solid auteur Hideo Kojima as his first release after breaking up with his career-long publisher, Konami, even the marketing for the game centered entirely around the bizarre, star-studded cinematics and inherent mystery surrounding its visuals. Featuring Norman Reedus and Mads Mikkelsen, alongside supporting performances by Guillermo Del Toro, Léa Seydoux, and Margaret Qualley, Death Stranding exists in a bizarre subspace between movie, video game, and something else entirely.

A Game That's Not Fun to Play

Death StrandingKojima Productions

Set in a post-apocalyptic America, the plot of Death Stranding follows Norman Reedus' Sam Porter Bridges, a porter with aphenphosmphobia (a fear of being touched, both physically and emotionally) who carries packages for a government organization called Bridges led by his mother, President Bridget Strand. With humanity all but wiped out, civilization hinges on a few remote waystations, bunkers, and prepper outposts. Bridges tasks Sam with connecting all of these stations to the "chiral network"—a supernatural, high-tech Internet of sorts—meaning that Sam must travel across America on foot, delivering supplies and convincing preppers to share their information with the government. As any fan of Kojima's work already knows, the plot gets mind-numbingly complicated, but that's the basic premise.

The core gameplay of Death Stranding is walking across vast stretches of barren, oftentimes gorgeous terrain, packages in tow. As Sam Porter Bridges, every rock and bump on the ground is a fresh obstacle to stumble over, with the threat of hard, cargo-damaging falls hanging over your every step. Your shoes and equipment degrade as you trek across the wasteland. You constantly check the weather to avoid "Timefall"—contaminated rain that speeds up aging for anything it touches. Power-ups come in the form of more advanced equipment that allows you to carry more weight or cling to hillsides a little bit easier, but none of it ever changes the careful, difficult manner in which you're forced to move throughout the world whilst lugging heavy packages. If that sounds grueling and tedious, well, it is.

There are enemies, too, in the form of MULEs and BTs. MULEs are other porters who have lost their minds and now troll around encampments in the wilderness waiting to steal packages from any porter unfortunate enough to enter their territory. BTs, on the other hand, are supernatural ghost-like creatures which loiter in the air, waiting for you to get close so they can pull you into otherworldly pits of black tar (wherein giant BT animals attempt to kill you and, more pressingly, ruin your packages). You're given weapons to deal with both of these threats if necessary, but no matter how much you upgrade your bullets, the battles are long, fraught, and stressful. Avoidance is always the easier approach.

Then there's Lou, your BB, or bridge baby, which is essentially a baby in a pod who can sense BTs. The narrative presents BBs as a tool, not to be mixed up with real, living babies, but that doesn't stop Sam (and by proxy, you) from forming a genuine connection with Lou as the only two sentient beings traveling together for miles and miles. Lou coos when you run quickly or escape a tense scenario and blows heart-shaped bubbles to show affection. Lou is also an ever-present consideration during gameplay. If Lou gets too stressed, then he'll enter a comatose state called autotoxemia, and anytime you take a tumble or get hurt, Lou will start crying, which echoes loudly from your controller. To soothe him, you need to manually detach his pod from your suit and gently rock the controller back and forth.

But while one might think that gameplay would be more stressful with a crying BB attached to their chest 24/7 than without, Lou is taken away from you for an extended period of the game, which ends up being an absolute nightmare to deal with—partially due to your inability to detect BTs, but also due to the feeling of loneliness that sinks in as you hike snowy mountain tops with your only traveling partner absent. Therein lies the reason why Death Stranding so deeply affected me, perhaps more than any other game I've ever played.

A Game With a Powerful Theme

Death Stranding SamKojima Productions

Death Stranding breaks you down through boring, repetitive, yet challenging gameplay that requires constant attention. Once you've mastered the basics, the gameplay loop inspires a borderline meditative state, wherein you're forced to reflect upon the very concept of walking in a video game. What is the purpose of playing a game like this? Is this even a game?

Death Stranding opens with an excerpt from surrealist Japanese author Kobo Abe's short story, "Nawa":

"The 'rope,' along with the 'stick,' together, are two of mankind's oldest tools. The stick to keep the bad away, the rope used to bring the good toward us. They were our first friends, of our own invention. Wherever there were people, there were the rope and the stick."

Everything in Death Stranding, absolutely everything, revolves around the theme of humans choosing to connect with one another instead of driving each other away. But Kojima isn't content with players simply recognizing that theme. He wants them to experience it for themselves. Every element of Death Stranding is intended to put players into Sam's headspace as an antisocial loner, and ultimately find comfort through human connection—not just through the narrative but through the actual gameplay.

In a lot of ways, Death Stranding is less a video game and more an indefinable work of participatory art. It would be impossible to talk about the merits of Death Stranding without delving into the deeply personal experience of playing it, and yet, so many of those experiences are so minute that they'll undoubtedly sound absurd to anyone who hasn't played it themselves.

For example, some of the tools at Sam's disposal include ladders, climbing anchors, and bridges, which Sam can set up to help scale particularly difficult ground. Then, assuming you're playing online, whenever you bring a local waystation onto the chiral network, the structures that other players have built will appear for your use, too. When you use one, or if you happen to be feeling kind, you can award that player with "Likes"—which have very little practical in-game use.

But alongside immediately useful tools like ladders, players can also construct seemingly useless signposts displaying emoji-like symbols including smiley faces and thumbs ups. When the concept was first introduced, I immediately thought it was stupid—or more specifically, "Who would ever use these?"

A little later, I was tasked with delivering packages to a remote weather station nestled atop a steep mountain. Throughout the course of my slow, arduous climb, I was caught in a heavy Timefall and attacked by BTs. With packages degraded and shoes worn out, I barely managed to escape their ghostly tar pits. Finally I reached the station to make my delivery and bring them onto the chiral network. Then it dawned on me—I couldn't actually rest at an outpost. Before I could properly recover my energy, I'd need to make it all the way back to a proper hub, back through the rain, back down the mountain. The dread felt so real. But as I reached the top of the first rough peak to begin my long descent, something caught my eye. Someone had posted a thumbs up sign.

A warm sense of comfort immediately washed over me. I wasn't alone. Someone else had been here, another human being. They had conquered this trial, and they left this sign to assure me that I could do it, too. There was no logic to my response; it was entirely emotional. I awarded the thumbs up sign the most Likes I possibly could, and from then on, whenever I topped a particularly challenging peak, I left a sign, too. Every so often, the game would notify me that someone else liked a sign I set up, and I couldn't help but feel like I was part of something larger than myself.

And then there are the moments where, at the height of a horrible trek, you catch sight of a breathtaking mountain vista rendered with some of the most photorealistic graphics you've ever seen in a video game. Or you hit the bottom of a slope, the next hub just on the horizon, as a haunting Low Roar song begins to play (seriously, the soundtrack is incredible). These moments are fleeting, profound, and wholly beyond words. The world may be empty, but you're not alone. Even at the end of the world, there's still beauty, and there are still people on the other side. Kojima instills these views in us not through telling or demanding, but by leading us to understand for ourselves...and then he puts what we've learned to the test.

A Game With a Greater Point

***MASSIVE ENDGAME SPOILERS FOLLOW

Author's Note: Before proceeding, please, please, please ask yourself whether or not you ever plan to play this game. As a lifelong gamer, I'm confident that going into Death Stranding with as little knowledge as possible is truly one of the greatest experiences possible. It's not too late to turn back.

If you've already finished the game, or really never plan on playing, please proceed.***

Death Stranding AmelieKojima Productions

The final confrontation in Death Stranding will forever stick with me as one of the most brilliant strokes of storytelling and game design imaginable.

Upon completing your task and reconnecting America, Sam is faced with horrifying reality that his mother, Bridget Strand, is an Extinction Entity—a being whose entire purpose is to bring about a massive global extinction event (this makes more sense in context of the larger plot). Bridget hands Sam a gun and tells him that he has two choices. Option one: Sam can shoot her, potentially stopping the destruction she's already set off, but with the caveat that he'll be trapped forever on her interdimensional Beach (this also makes sense in context of the larger plot). Option two: Sam can do nothing, spending his last few moments with his mother as the world ends and knowing full-well that if it doesn't end now, then it will end eventually.

You resume gameplay with the gun drawn. You have six bullets. Bridget slowly walks from the Beach's sandy bank towards the horizon, where a giant, apocalyptic ball of destruction looms in the sky. Clearly, the game expects you to shoot Bridget, but if you fire the gun at her, the bullets warp through her like she's an apparition. As soon as you run out of bullets, you're out of options. Tears of blood run from Bridget's eyes as she rises into the sky. The world is over, and the game resets to the beginning of the confrontation.

I imagine that it takes most players a few tries to figure out what they're missing. Why won't the bullets work? Is there something else to shoot? Did Kojima hide something somewhere? The answer is no. You're not missing anything. You're just not thinking about the scenario properly.

After my own slew of failed attempts, it dawned on me: Death Stranding is all about connecting with people. Just like Abe's quote in the beginning of the game said, the gun is the "stick." In that case, what is my "rope?" I unequipped the gun and approached Bridget, causing an action prompt to appear: "Hug."

Indeed, hugging Bridget in the face of armageddon effectively ceases the destruction of humanity. By connecting, by drawing people closer, we accomplish far more for humanity than we do by pushing them away. Hideo Kojima knows that every video game we've ever played has conditioned us to shoot when given a gun. Through setting up a scenario where the gun we're given is useless, he forces us to utilize the lessons that he has attempted to instill in us throughout the entirety of the game.

If the average video game is a power fantasy that grants you superhuman skills and cool powers, Death Stranding feels almost like a de-powerment simulator. And yet, it all serves a thematic point. The emotional core of Death Stranding is conveyed so powerfully, so experientially, that it's hard to picture any other medium providing anything even close. I didn't have fun with Death Stranding, but I felt frustration and wonderment. I laughed occasionally, and I cried, too. Death Stranding connected me with other people I couldn't even see, and I walked away with a deep sense of emotional fulfillment. Connection is everything, and I feel that in my core—that's the beauty of Death Stranding.

Gaming

ROLE PLAYGROUND | Thirteen years later, does Kingdom Hearts II still hold up?

In light of Kingdom Hearts III's potential release, I've decided to take a look back at the second (and best, so far) major installment in the franchise.

In light of recent events, I felt it appropriate to dust off my PlayStation 3 and dive into one of the most important game series of my short, gaming life. It took a while to figure which one to choose, after all, there have been a lot over the years. In the end though, I decided to pick the real classic. The sequel to the original that improved upon literally everything. It's fighting was smoother, magic worked better, and there were even some fun new things to try.

Although, that was thirteen years ago. At the time, the game felt groundbreaking - and after playing it again, the nostalgia gripped me really hard. I was back in my childhood, playing screaming at my PS2 as Demyx chanted, "Dance water dance!" Unfortunately, that didn't last - and I began to notice some things. Not enough to dampen my experience, but it was definitely enough for me to stop and really think about why I loved this game so much. And it also made me think about how much Kingdom Hearts III will have to do to please people nowadays.

It's a beautiful game - and I had fun, but there's a lot that doesn't hold up anymore.

Keep ReadingShow less


Listen, I sat down with every intention of playing Monster Hunter: World and loving the hell out of it. It's a game that's beautiful and grand, but this grandiose beauty got lost in the game's playability. I also walked into this game blind - having never played a MH game before in my life. And sure, that definitely hindered my experience - because I know that this series has specific conventions, but that shouldn't matter.

A big game like this should be able to appeal to more than just fans, and obviously it has, but I feel like there are some key issues that need to be addressed. While the world is beautiful, and the character designs are fun and funky, it gets screwed over by clunky fight controls that overshadow the game's more innovative moments.

THE GAME

Monster Hunter: World takes place on a continent called The New World, a mostly uninhabited continent filled with a lush, harsh environment. Several fleets have come to the island and created settlements for both research and obviously hunting and tracking the many creatures that inhabit the island. You take control of your Hunter, and along with your Handler, are called with the Fifth Fleet - which has been summoned by the Research Commission.

Upon arrival, you barely survive an encounter with a massive Elder Dragon, Zorah Magdaros, and make it to the settlement of Astera. Once you settle in, you are told that the Fifth Fleet is responsible for figuring what draws the Zorah Magdaros to this lush, new world by tracking it's movements and setting up camp based on where it goes. And by clearing out other hostile monsters, of course.

THE GOOD

There's a lot of good in this game, obviously. It's received massive acclaim upon its release. I think the biggest part has to be the lush world design and the active environments within that world. From the very beginning, I was treated to a world so beautiful and vibrant and got I mesmerized by it. It's very difficult for an open world to feel so alive - and I'm thankful that these guys made it such an important aspect of the game.

I know that when I travel around this world for a hunt - I'm going to interact with an environment that reacts to me, and that matters! It mostly works really well, it makes the hunts very dynamic and if it weren't for the controls - I'd keep singing praises.

Of course, the environments aren't the only thing that this game has going for it. I was surprised at how much I liked the character designs. I'm usually a less-is-more kind of guy - growing up with Enix's out-there designs would do that to you - but there's a certain charm in the way Monster Hunter does things. The big weapons seem small next to the large enemies - and the freedom in the character creator helps you make whatever kind of character you want! It's nice.

THE BAD

The bad part of this game concerns me the most. In a game that revolves Monster Hunting, the controls just need to be better. A lot of this bled through from previous games - and I understand that, and I'm sure that a lot of people have gotten used to them. And obviously a lot of other people have managed to power through - but I just couldn't. From the first fight - I struggled.

I didn't struggle because the game was hard (or harder than a game like this should be), I struggled because the fighting mechanics were annoying. The combo system felt slow and obnoxious - even with the so-called fast movement weapons like the sword and shield.

New controls should be a learning curve, but I feel like there should be a level of intuitiveness that just wasn't there for me. It really breaks the immersion and makes the game less fun, which is unfortunate, because there is a lot of really good stuff here. But games need good controls and I don't think Monster Hunter: World has them.

THE BOTTOM LINE

This game is hit or miss. It was a definite miss for me, and I won't be purchasing my own copy. I'm glad my little brother has his! I do think that some people will find it fun, and the obviously already have, so I'd definitely say rent the game first. In some way? Maybe? But yeah, I didn't enjoy it, because the controls weren't fun.

I don't care how beautiful a game is - it has to be fun.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gaming

ROLE PLAYGROUND | Why is Iconoclasts so good?

I'm not always the most partial to platformers, but I'll be damned if Iconoclasts isn't a whole lot of fun.

Platformers are a delicate art form.

They have to be fun, but not repetitive. The puzzles have to be difficult, but not too difficult. And, if you don't have an incredibly interesting story - then you better have some damned fun gameplay. It's a tricky rope to walk - and a lot of them times people stumble.

Joakim Sandberg's Iconoclasts manages to balance perfectly. The game's Metroidvania style of exploration combined with a fun, quirky combat system makes this game feel both incredibly familiar and refreshing. It's brilliant, and even if it does have a few misses here or there, that should not detract from how wonderful of a game it is.

THE GAME

[VF41EH1517213704]

In Iconoclasts, you play as Robin, an mechanic who assists the other members of her village, Settlement 17, against the laws of their totalitarian religious regime, the One Concern. Non-Concern approved mechanics have been outlawed, due to the Concern's control over the Ivory Oil industry - and anyone who breaks this law will be subject to Penance, a powerful machine that destroy houses and villages that go against the Concern's wishes. Unfortunately for Robin, it seems the Concern is onto her - and the people she's supposed to be helping.

THE GOOD

First and foremost, I need to talk about the sheer amount of story and lore that this game presents you with. After completing the first little puzzle you're presented with, you come upon Settlement 17. It's a small village, and you are well-known there as both a mechanic and friend, but people also fear you. As you progress through their first section, you learn that you are operating against the laws of the land, and people are blaming you for the destruction of their village.

There's a lovely, sad moment in the very beginning when you enter the house of an older woman and her young son. They are housing a man who has lost his home and his wife to Penance. He doesn't understand why their god has looked down on them - they never did anything wrong. Afterwards, you talk to the older woman - her son brings in a wrench of his own - and his mother freaks out! She can't have her son breaking laws, and sends you away for being a bad influence.

[LXBII91517213704] You, with Mr. Andress, the main staying with the woman and her son.1.bp.blogspot.com

All of this happened so fast, and it told me so much about the world that Sandberg is attempting to create. Beneath the vibrancy and fun colors, he's created people who are hurting - and it mostly works in the game's benefit.

Of course, that's not to say that this game is incredibly serious and dramatic. It does a good job balancing the serious moments with the fantastic and/or humorous. The fast-paced game-play also keeps you from getting too bogged down in reading a lot of lore - you are able to learn things organically and through story-related cut scenes. And, much like most exploration-oriented games, you have the option to explore deeper and learn more if you wish.

Another brilliant part of the game is it's diverse cast of characters and companions - the first of which you meet within the first two hours of the game. I can't speak for all of them, because I'm still making my way through the rest of the game - but the characters I've met have been some of the best I've seen. Even compared to most AAA titles - I have cared more about these characters than most other game characters I've seen.

THE BAD

[85842J1517213704]

I think that this game suffers from the same problems that a lot of games of this kind have - difficulty spikes. Listen, I know that games - especially platformers - are supposed to have level of difficulty when it comes to both puzzles and creatures fought, I understand that, but it really hurts the game in my eyes. It breaks the immersion and often has me wondering why it was even added.

Difficult should increase gradually as the player plays the game, unless the game was created to be difficult, which is not the case here. Of course, this isn't an issue that everyone has - and I accept that. But when you have a game that's as surprisingly story-driven as Iconoclasts, then it needs just a little more balance than what we were given, okay?

There's also an issue of tone. As I said in the GOOD section, the game has a lot of darkness beneath it's poppy, pixelated world - and I feel like the vibrancy can almost distract from that. I know that it was a choice, but I don't think it was a totally right one most of the time. That's all I can say without getting too spoiler-y, but let me know what you think.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Iconoclasts is a brilliant platformer - and despite it's issues, it's definitely worth a play through. It's a solid game with a lot of content, and it's only $20 on Steam - so it's not like you're throwing away a lot of money. So, go ahead and play it, and be sure to tell me what you think!

Keep ReadingShow less