MUSIC

Lady Gaga Leads the “Kindness Punks” in a Fight for Peace in “Stupid Love” Video

"Stupid Love" is a return to the Lady Gaga we fell in love with a decade ago.

Lady Gaga - Stupid Love (Official Music Video)

In a world that valorizes independence, it can be difficult to admit that all you want is to be loved.

But that's exactly what Lady Gaga does in her latest single, "Stupid Love." Clad in pink lingerie and wearing futuristic headgear, she proclaims over and over that all she truly wants is affection.

The song itself isn't exquisite, but it serves its purpose well. The drop is electrifying, ideal for cathartic club nights and drunk Lyft singalongs. The track and video both feel like they could be straight out of 2011, perhaps a B-side on Born This Way.

Will songs like "Stupid Love" hold up in 2020, though? The jaded experimentalism of Billie Eilish and the multi-genre stylings of Lil Nas X seem to be taking precedence over traditional pop. In a world where all art is political, immediately susceptible to rigorous Twitter analysis and the whims of TikTok algorithms, Gaga's old bag tricks may not serve her as well as they once did. Plus, the wild costumes and antics she became known for are now staples in the music industry.

Fortunately, Gaga—always an intoxicating showwoman—is adept at crafting magnetic visuals, and the "Stupid Love" video certainly takes advantage of her ever-futuristic artistic sensibilities.

In the video, Gaga plays the leader of a group called the "Kindness Punks," a militant dance team fighting for peace in a violent world. "The world rots in conflict," an opening statement reads in the video's first frame. "Many tribes fight for dominance. While the Spiritual ones pray and sleep for peace, the Kindness punks fight for Chromatica." From there, Gaga and her futuristic hippie punks dance their way across a desert, twirling past luminescent crystal rock formations until they come into contact with two conflicting troupes. Gaga manages to levitate some of the brawlers, and peace is achieved.

Lady Gaga - Stupid Love (Official Music Video)www.youtube.com

Chromatica is most likely the name of Gaga's forthcoming album, which is slated to drop in the next few weeks. Judging by this single, it'll be a return to her dance-bangers of old, and—after the folky turn of Joanne and A Star Is Born—it feels like coming home. "I put all my heart, all my pain, all my messages from the other realm [into this album]," said Gaga to Zane Lowe in a recent Apple Music interview. "I want people to dance and feel happy."

Gaga accompanied the video release with a tweet that read "Earth is cancelled," but maybe she's just in time. In a world run by Trumps and Putins pushed to paranoia by coronavirus and apocalyptic climate change headlines, of course love is probably the only thing that can save us. Gaga's just one of the few pop stars not afraid to shout it from the rooftops.

CULTURE

How Social Media Changed Celebrity Relationships

Social media has ruined celebrity relationships and built empires— from Chris Pratt to Kim Kardashian, tabloid culture has risen to explosive, new heights via Twitter and Instagram.

Gaga and Cooper

Photo by Matt Petit/A.M.P.A.S./Shutterstock

Irina Shayk and Bradley Cooper broke up after 4 years of dating, which included almost a year's worth of rumors about Cooper's friendship with costar Lady Gaga.

Gaga was eager to gush about Cooper, gazing breathlessly into his eyes anytime they were on a red carpet. Their on-screen love led to off screen speculation about their undeniable chemistry. A Star is Born's press run concluded with many awards and, honestly, has yet to entirely end. The pair's charm began to wear thin as people became annoyed by Gaga and put off by Cooper's hubris.

The movie's press run was reminiscent of older Hollywood tactics, when co-stars pretended to be in a relationship to promote their films and each other's careers. Nowadays, celebrity relationships can be mutually beneficial arrangements that not only increase the star's respective cultural relevance and fan bases, but offer the opportunity to building a corporate brand around their romance.

When famous couples do break up, fans experience a fraction of the star's heartbreak because of months or years of investment in the couple—following their relationships online, in videos, and on talk shows. One of the most notable couples in recent years to use social media to address their break up was Anna Faris and Chris Pratt. Anna posted a text message to her feed and Chris posted the same on Facebook, personalizing the PR announcement.

Social media has offered celebrities a way to directly talk to the public and vice versa. In return, fans can begin to feel like they know their favorite celebrities personally, beyond the voyeurism of magazine readers. Online, the public has a voice that intervenes in the real life relationships of celebrities. Now, social media allows fans to relentlessly weigh in on stars' personal lives with relative anonymity.

Months after her separation from her Pratt, Faris detailed her marriage's narrative, explaining how the rumors about her then-husband and his co-star, Jennifer Lawrence, made her feel "incredibly insecure" during the Passengers' press run, with tabloids constantly covering the chummy pair. The media's speculation over who is dating who can be rooted in truth, but can also have real world effects on relationships.

Similarly, rumors of a romance between Harry Styles and Louis Tomlinson percolated for a long period. In turn, fans' obsession about the two became paralyzing for the friendship. Back in 2017, Tomlinson commented on how their hyper-analyzed interactions ruined their relationship:

"It created this atmosphere between the two of us where everyone was looking into everything we did. It took away the vibe you get off anyone. It made everything, I think on both fences, a little bit more unapproachable."

The public's ability to comment whatever whenever online escalates the power of the media to insert themselves into celebrity relationships. The stampede of opinions from journalists and online trolls can be suffocating and destroy relationships, like the many who theorize to this day about Shayk and Cooper. Eventually, Lady Gaga told people to "f**k off" after being heckled, once again, about Cooper, a reaction that almost certainly came from a place of exhaustion from the constant rumors.

Meanwhile, celebrities in secure relationships are able to profit off social media by building their image around their personal lives. Chrissy Teigen became an internet sensation through Twitter, molding a career beyond modeling while expanding her family with John Legend. Last year, the husband and wife began starring in ads together, the first being for Google Duo. The pair even hosted A Very Legendary Christmas together on NBC, which proved the couple's immense marketability. Their relatability and online banter are easy selling points for those who care about a more down to earth, famous family.

Before the dominance of social media, the Kardashians were some of the first celebrities to utilize the platform to elevate their fame by connecting with fans and bringing them a step further into their "lives." At the time, Kim's relationship with Kanye was one of the first to demonstrate the possibilities for A-List influencers. Their relationship propelled Kim into another realm of celebrity and exhibited how the internet can heighten celebrities' reputations. Each Kardashian has been able to increase their visibility due to the people they date or wed. While that is not a new concept, the direct accessibility to the stars through our personal devices increases individuals' investment in following celebrities' daily lives. In the meantime, celebrities take advantage of their devoted fans. With the saturation of ads and promotional posts embedded in personal content, it can feel like one can't escape capitalism: Celebrities want us to conflate purchasing their endorsed products with being a supportive fan.

Unfortunately, the difference between social media and self promotion is becoming more difficult to differentiate. With the rise of social media, celebrity brands are more cultivated than ever, and the means of promoting those brands are through rumors and publicity about high-profile relationships rather than artistic work. The subconscious reckoning of tabloid culture manifests in a more personal, somewhat inescapable way which can ruin relationships or increase net worth, all while staying in a field of vision consumers can enjoy by taking toxic pleasure in gossip.

Lego Movie

via Warner Brothers

Welcome back to "Now in Theaters: 5 New Movies for the Weekend."

Maximize your time by only seeing the movies recommended to you by some guy on the Internet.

Keep ReadingShow less

As mentioned in our 2018 year-end review, the year in film comprised a strange but satisfying mix of big-budget blockbusters and smaller, specific stories. Now, with a slate of Best Picture nominees ranging from Roma and The Favourite to Bohemian Rhapsody and Black Panther, it's clear the Academy feels similarly. But cast a net that wide and there are bound to be some snubs and surprises.

Snub: Women

There are no women in contention for the Best Director award this year, despite the fact that critics could not stop talking about the brilliance of Chloe Zhao's The Rider, Lynne Ramsey's You Were Never Really Here, and Debra Granik's Leave No Trace. Even Marielle Heller, whose Can You Ever Forgive Me? earned two acting nominations and a Best Adapted Screenplay nomination, couldn't seem to break into the category.

Surprise: Male Actors

Willem Defoe, Sam Rockwell, Viggo Mortensen, and Rami Malek all snagged acting nominations. On paper, the nominations of two returning nominees and a newcomer arriving on the wind of a great performance doesn't seem surprising. Yet add together the fact that Defoe's nomination is the sole nomination for At Eternity's Gate, Rockwell's and Malek's are for roles in films with broadly tepid reviews, and Mortensen's is for a film that's been regarded as problematic (to put it lightly), and the result is a strange, uneven lineup. Add again that BlackkKlansman lead John David Washington was shut out altogether, and the result seems like a mess.

Snub: No Director Nomination for Bradley Cooper

Surely Bradley Cooper is thrilled that his directorial debut, A Star is Born, has garnered eight nominations, including Best Picture. While the film has been recognized for acting, writing, music, and cinematography, he was left out of contention for Best Director, which he wanted so badly we could all taste it. Alas, like Ben Affleck before him, he couldn't seem to go full Clooney. Which proves that there can be 24 awards at the Oscars, and you can be nominated for eight of them, but only one is the one that will make the industry take you seriously as a filmmaker, and that, to Bradley, is Best Director.


Rebecca Linde is a writer and cultural critic in NYC. She tweets about pop culture and television @rklinde.


POP⚡ DUST | Read More…

"Jane" Spins Off, Gilead Gets New Neighbors, and more: This Week's TV News

Now in Theaters: New Movies for the Weekend of January 25

"Glass" Is Enjoyable If You Don't Get Your Hopes Up

Bios

Bradley Cooper

All you need to know.

Full Name: Bradley Charles Cooper

Date of Birth: January 5, 1975

Born: Philadelphia, PA

Occupation: Actor, filmmaker

Status: Single

Children: 1

Keep ReadingShow less
Bios

Lady Gaga

All you need to know.

Full Name: Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta

Date of Birth: March 28, 1986

Born: New York City, NY

Occupation: Singer, actress

Status: Engaged to Christian Carino

Children: 0

Keep ReadingShow less