In the space of two days, Jamil has attacked Piers Morgan's blatant misogyny and launched a campaign for Bumble friendship.
Jameela Jamil, the firebrand who became famous both for her breakout role on NBC's The Good Place and for her brand of fearless, anti-diet digital activism, did not mince words when clapping back at "irrelevant sh*t stain" (her words, not ours) Piers Morgan.
Jamil was one of the fifteen women featured on British Vogue's issue entitled "Forces for Change," guest-edited by Meghan Markle. She appeared alongside environmental activist Greta Thunberg, trans actress Laverne Cox, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, and many more powerful female change-makers.
In response, Morgan published a shockingly embittered and almost unbelievably ignorant op-ed in
The Daily Mail, which mostly consisted of poorly worded criticism directed at Markle and all the women of the world. "The women she's selected represent the greatest hits of virtue-signalling - with a nod to everything from 'body positivity', female empowerment, mental health, disability and race to transgender rights, climate change, diversity, and privilege," he wrote. "The last one made me laugh out loud. I'm sure the one thing we all need most in the world right now is a fabulously rich and entitled Princess lecturing us on privilege from her servant-laden royal quarters."
Morgan then turned his wrath from Markle to Jamil, criticizing the duchess's decision to post Jamil's face on the cover of the issue of British Vogue and citing some of Jamil's past mistakes. "The list of women Jamil has abused and shamed for falling short of her lofty moral standard is long," Morgan wrote, citing how Jamil has previously "hoped Cardi B and Iggy Azalea 'sh*t their pants in public,' "accused Miley Cyrus of being 'a vagina without a platform'" and "compared Beyoncé to a 'stripper.'"
Jamil was quick to respond. In her typically intelligent fashion, she didn't try to deny the problems with her past comments. Instead, she owned up to them. "My PINNED tweet is all of the mistakes I made, owning up to being problematic when I was young. I have nothing to hide," she tweeted Monday. "You are old, and still a problematic slut-shaming, fat-shaming, misogynist, irrelevant sh*t stain, smeared across our country."
Jamil's willingness to admit her own mistakes, as well as her fearlessness when confronting bigoted and dangerous ideas, has made her a beloved Internet personality and helped her gain the spot on Markle's cover. In Jamil and Markle's world, feminism is a constantly growing, expanding category, based on forward motion, learning, and change.
As for Morgan, despite his apparent desire to see more socioeconomically diverse female Vogue editors, it seems that, at heart, he's genuinely motivated by a hatred for feminism and all that it stands for, along with nostalgia for a time when being a white man meant he had an all-access pass to any space.
"We're informed the Duchess spent the past seven months creating 'an issue of inclusivity and inspiration, focusing on what connects rather than what divides us," he wrote. "How thoughtful of her! Yet of course her list excludes the planet's entire male population."
The exchange happened the day before Jamil launched her partnership with BumbleBFF's new campaign #AskingForaFriend, which is dedicated to ending the stigma around loneliness and making it easier for people to find friendship.
Ironically, Bumble itself has been accused of promoting a
misogynistic company culture, but one would hope that Jamil has done her research—or another Twitter rant is coming quite soon.
- Piers Morgan Labelled An 'Irrelevant S*** Stain' By Jameela Jamil ... ›
- Jameela Jamil Fires Back At Piers Morgan Over Criticism Of Meghan ... ›
- Piers Morgan Responds to Jameela Jamil After She Calls Him the ... ›
- Jameela Jamil calls Piers Morgan an 'old, irrelevant s*** stain' in ... ›
- Jameela Jamil Slammed Piers Morgan For Criticizing Meghan ... ›
- Meghan Markle's cover star attacked by 's*** stain' Piers Morgan in ... ›
- Jameela Jamil slams Piers Morgan over British Vogue diss ›
- Meghan Markle: Piers Morgan, Jameela Jamil spar over Vogue issue ›
- Meghan Markle Piers Morgan and Jameela Jamil ›
- Jameela Jamil Unloads On Piers Morgan Over Meghan Markle ... ›
To Donald Trump: 5 Ways You're Actually a Flawless Being Doing a Beautiful, Unbelievable Job Right Now
You could resign if you want to, but then who will keep America so GD great?
With Donald Trump making a visit to Bangor, Maine today, the editorial board of the Portland Press Herald issued an op-ed calling for President Trump to resign.
The harshly critical piece entitled "To President Trump: You Should Resign Now" was framed as an open letter to the president and got straight to the point with this opening plea, "We're sorry that you decided to come to Maine, but since you are here, could you do us a favor? Resign."
In recent days even George W. Bush has been critical of President Trump's response to protests, so this new piece quickly became a trending topic on Twitter. Obviously this is another baseless attack from the lying news media—AKA lügenpresse. Considering how delicate our president's ego is—he's our special little guy—we can only hope that Donald Trump didn't see the letter; but just in case he did, it's worth writing another one to lift his spirits. So here's our best attempt—with lots of pictures and flattery to keep him reading:
You Know How to Look Tough<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMzM3NTYyNy9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYwOTE5Nzc3M30.9B4CSWzpZGjBq7APFv_KJKf-QV8n2kEIYcBIOTUt02k/img.jpg?width=980" id="0a07e" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="980538d3ccf27d180ce2f7e147f1259f" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="trump eagle scared" /><p>Joe Biden is always trying to challenge you to push up contests or saying he would "<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/21/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump/index.html" target="_blank">beat the hell</a>" out of you, but you don't engage with that nonsense. You know that it's not important for a leader to actually be tough as long as you look tough. That's why you avoid protesters like the plague. In 2018 you <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/12/donald-trump-visit-to-london-called-off-amid-fears-of-mass-protests" target="_blank">canceled your London trip</a> amid protests there, and more recently, you authorized the use of violent force to disperse peaceful demonstrators <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-calls-tear-gas-reports-fake-news-protesters/story?id=71052769" target="_blank">so you could have a photo-op in front of a church</a>.</p><p>Whether it's because you don't want to be seen as having less than absolute control over the unruly crowds, or just because you pee a little bit whenever you're around political activism (probably that), we all owe you a debt of gratitude for avoiding any confrontation or engagement with <a href="https://www.popdust.com/jimmy-fallon-blackface-2646105674.html" target="_blank">the mass protests against police brutality</a> that are taking place throughout our country right now—why engage when you can just use more police brutality to avoid them altogether?! It's the only way for you to maintain that all-important facade of toughness that makes you undeniably the most respected current president of the United States. And now that you've <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/white-house-fence-protests-washington-1508703" target="_blank">surrounded the White House with two miles of barricade—</a>#BuildThatWall—we never have to worry about press cameras catching sight of a faint stain spreading out from the crotch of your pants.</p>
You Know Who the Real Enemy Is<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMzM3NTYyMS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyNzg3NjY1M30.J6PsxmoxCL_8jSPRBcTHkFrHNRm7bgVmYzBcXmfDNHQ/img.jpg?width=980" id="c7b59" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f8a213c28f6c8ba27cef403b76ff012c" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="trump after you tweet" /><p>Earlier this year FBI director Christopher Wray announced that racist domestic violence was <a href="https://www.npr.org/2020/02/10/804616715/fbi-announces-that-racist-violence-is-now-equal-priority-to-foreign-terrorism" target="_blank">being prioritized just as much as foreign terror threats</a>. On one level that could be seen as a sign that white supremacy is a major problem in the US, and that perpetrators of deadly hate crimes should be labeled terrorists, but you know better—obviously, since you're both very stable and a genius. If we start labeling white people as terrorists, then it will just make it harder to keep stoking fears about Islam, bad hombres, and other brown people problems.</p><p>Besides, if white men can be bad guys too, then that could include you! And as we all know, an attack against you is <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7808431/Trump-channels-Uncle-Sam-tweet-saying-Democrats-just-way.html" target="_blank">actually an attack against all good, patriotic Americans</a>. Therefore the real enemy is anyone trying to aggressively call out and push back against white supremacy and white nationalism. That's why <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/antifa-group-trump-designate-terrorist-organization/story?id=71045287" target="_blank">you want to designate Antifa a terrorist organization</a>. Who cares that they <a href="https://www.factcheck.org/2020/06/trump-cant-designate-antifa-or-any-movement-domestic-terrorist-organization/" target="_blank">aren't even an organization at all—</a>it's just an ethos of publicly and aggressively confronting fascism and related ideologies. And who cares if there's no way to single out anti-fascist activism from wider, constitutionally protected protests like the Black Lives Matter movement?</p><p>Treating people who oppose you as terrorists will free you up to <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52932611" target="_blank">unleash state violence</a>, <a href="https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/watchlists" target="_blank">surveillance, and travel restrictions</a>. Besides, we already have <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52932611" target="_blank">a hyper-militarized police force</a>, which has worked out great—apart from a few "<a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/500328-national-security-adviser-blames-a-few-bad-apples-says-theres-not" target="_blank">bad apples</a>" (who seem to operate with impunity for some reason, right up until there's a mass uprising). So put "<a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-my-generals-my-military-2017-10" target="_blank">your military</a>" to work and crack down on all of them with the full force of martial law! Or, as you put it, "<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/2020-daily-trail-markers-trump-declares-we-will-dominate-the-streets/" target="_blank">Dominate the streets.</a>" Keep <a href="https://theintercept.com/2020/06/04/fbi-nypd-political-spying-antifa-protests/" target="_blank">interrogating protesters about their political beliefs</a>, and if enough of them end up too scared or too imprisoned or too dead to keep opposing you, you won't even have to take away their voting rights (although, we should look into that) to be a shoe-in for reelection!</p>
You Know that Free Speech Is Not as Important as Guns<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="528bc162ed6e6a07fe1e0245016bffff"><iframe lazy-loadable="true" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-K7XJGk8lyQ?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span><p>In your recent announcement that you were "mobilizing all available federal resources, civilian and military, to stop the rioting and looting," you said you were doing so "to protect the rights of law-abiding Americans, including your second amendment rights." It was the only amendment you mentioned, and you even gave it some extra emphasis <a href="https://www.indy100.com/article/trump-second-amendment-speech-george-floyd-protests-9544011" target="_blank">as though encouraging "law-abiding Americans" to exercise their gun rights</a> in the face of rioting—because gun-toting Trump supporters to mass demonstrations of institutional racism and white supremacy will...calm things down?</p><p>We don't have to fully understand you to appreciate the fact that you skipped over that pesky first amendment—with the free speech and right to assemble that could get in the way of your military dominating the streets—and got to the important one. Maybe the "innocent" man you touted in your speech—<a href="https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2020/05/31/unfounded-trump-tweet-echoes-heavy-metal-guitarist-claim-that-antifa-beat-machete-wielding-dallas-man/" target="_blank">who chased after people in Dallas while wielding a machete—</a>wouldn't have been "savagely beaten," if he'd been wielding a gun instead. Besides, everyone knows that the only real enemies of free speech are <a href="https://www.popdust.com/mark-zuckerberg-trump-2646117777.html" target="_blank">private companies who call you out for "glorifying violence."</a> As long as the American people retain the right to retweet you with impunity, they have all the free speech they need, and they should stay inside and protest in ways that don't disrupt established order or do anything to upset the status quo (because no one has the right to make you pee a little bit).</p>
You Value the Economy<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1268968348278292484" id="twitter-embed-1268968348278292484" lazy-loadable="true" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1268968348278292484&created_ts=1591380605.0&screen_name=CNN&text=The+President+went+from+talking+about+jobs+to+praising+police.+Then+he+claimed+it%27s+a+%22great+day%22+for+the+man+whose%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FP3mMAREHMc&id=1268968348278292484&name=CNN" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="51cee049686210db564d6bbf94f563e3"></iframe><p>Every president knows that the maintaining the economy is important, but as a business man—with that eagle-eyed focus on short term growth that has <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/donald-trumps-business-failures-were-very-real" target="_blank">led several of your businesses into bankruptcy</a>—you've made it clear that you value the economy more than anything else. Whether it's <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/05/politics/donald-trump-coronavirus-economy-models/index.html" target="_blank">the thousands of lives that will be lost</a> to the COVID-19 pandemic as we "reopen the economy" or t<a href="rgy-infrastructure-environmental-review-coronavirus" target="_blank">he dismantling of environmental regulations</a> that were getting in the way of cost-saving pollution, you don't let anything get in the way of a quick economic boost. You know that what's good for major industries today will be good for the American economy...also today.</p><p><span></span>Who cares about tomorrow?! We're having a hard time right now, and people want to <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/05/politics/trump-unemployment-numbers-protests/index.html" target="_blank">hear about how you've reduced unemployment</a>, not about 110,000 dead Americans or the necessity of police reform in the wake of <a href="https://www.popdust.com/derek-chauvin-hat-2646109506.html" target="_blank">George Floyd's murder at the hands of a police officer</a>. You can commemorate <a href="https://www.worldenvironmentday.global/" target="_blank">World Environment Day</a> by <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-environment-oceans/trump-plans-to-open-atlantic-sanctuary-to-commercial-fishing-sources-idUSKBN23C26N" target="_blank">opening up ocean conservation areas to commercial fishing</a>. Have ocean fish populations been cut in half over the last 50 years? Sure, but that means we have at least another decade or two before <a href="https://www.nrdc.org/stories/report-million-extinctions-and-ecological-collapse-are-way" target="_blank">the total collapse of marine ecosystems</a>, and by then it will be some other jerk's problem!</p>
You Could Probably Cure COVID-19 if You Really Wanted<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMzM3NTY4MS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYwOTQ4Njg1OX0.UrYXJOB4Wut0GXnPkWhdOIOzYHq4pAS3JSSKg2qvSlA/img.jpg?width=980" id="cad7c" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4d96bd6d9c28bdbcb31a1d0c32f23083" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="trump covid tester" /><p>Thanks to the fact that you have your priorities in order, and are purely focused on the economy, you haven't worried too much about all this pandemic nonsense—by, for example, providing adequate testing or not stealing vital PPE and ventilators from the states. You did <a href="https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-confirms-that-donald-trump-tried-to-buy-firm-working-on-coronavirus-vaccine/" target="_blank">try to get Americans exclusive access to a potential vaccine—</a>which would really stick it to all those jerks dying in other countries—but that didn't really pan out, so you'll probably just have to until the economy's sorted out so you can come up with a cure yourself.</p><p>After all, you have "<a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/30/donald-trump-iq-intelligence-1347149" target="_blank">one of the highest</a>" IQs, "<a href="https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/trump-foreign-policy-adviser-220853" target="_blank">a very good brain</a>", and "<a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-healthcare-us-medicine-coronavirus-centers-for-disease-control-a9384441.html" target="_blank">natural ability</a>" for medical science. It only took you a matter of moments and the most superficial level of thought to come up with a brilliant new avenue for research—injecting disinfectant into people's bodies—so you can probably have this whole thing sorted out in a day or two once you get around to it.</p>
- Maine Newspapers to Trump: “You Should Not Be Here” and “Resign” ›
- One of Maine's Largest Newspapers Calls on Trump to Resign as ... ›
- Portland Press Herald calls for Trump to resign as he prepares to ... ›
- To improve the US coronavirus response, Donald Trump should resign ›
- Our View: To President Trump: You should resign now - Portland ... ›
One comment at a time...
Jameela Jamil is best known for portraying the socialite Tahani Al-Jamil on NBC's The Good Place, but she's also been making waves online for her messages of body positivity and vehement protests against diet culture. Recently, she's been coming for some of the patron saints of body-shaming: the Kardashian family.
Every day, countless Instagram influencers promote various weight-loss supplements, such as flat-tummy teas or other sponsored (and usually untested) products. But few have the power of the Kardashians, who—between Kim, Khloé, Kourtney, and the Jenner sisters—reach over 453.5 million followers, and can be paid millions per sponsored post.
Over the past few months, each one of them has posted ads for various weight loss supplements. Jamil has often criticized celebrity endorsements of similar weight-loss products, and she held nothing back in a lengthy comment on Khloé Kardashian's latest ad.
"If you're too irresponsible to: (a) own up to the fact that you have a personal trainer, nutritionist, probable chef, and a surgeon to achieve your aesthetic, rather than this laxative product...and (b) tell them the side effects of this NON-FDA approved product, that most doctors are saying aren't healthy...then I guess I have to," Jamil wrote. "It's incredibly awful that this industry bullied you until you became this fixated on your appearance. That's the media's fault. But now please don't put that back into the world and hurt other girls the way you would have been hurt. You're a smart woman. Be smarter than this."
Just a few days earlier, Jamil had left a similar message on a Kris Jenner ad for a Flat Tummy Co shake. She later posted screenshots of the since-deleted comment, which read, "Flat Tummy Co side effects are cramping, stomach pains, diarrhea, and dehydration and it can impact contraception users. Eat fruit and veg to fill up and feel good kids. It's cheaper and safer than a non-FDA approved powder over the internet."�
Image from Metro.co.uk
At first Khloé, Kris, and co. did not seem receptive to the criticism. When the
New York Times asked her about Jamil's comments, Kris Jenner stated, "I don't live in that negative energy space. Ninety percent of people will be really excited about the family and the journey and who we are."
Khloé also defended her post, telling The Times that she doesn't have a personal chef and she posts all her workouts on Snapchat—which is somehow redemptive in the weird world of Kardashian logic. "Well, listen, I am showing you what to do, silly person, 15 repetitions, three times, here's the move …" she clarified.
Kim also had plenty of excuses. "If there is work that is really easy that doesn't take away from our kids, that's like a huge priority," she said. "If someone was faced with the same job opportunities, I think they would maybe consider." Of course, Kardashian West has a net worth of $350 million and previously turned down a $1 million payout for a post sponsored by a Yeezy fashion rival. (Kanye reimbursed her).
Jamil wasn't about to let the whole thing go. Following the interview's publication, she reposted some of the Kardashians' comments on her own Instagram and added, "The Kardashians need to check their moral compasses, because they appear to be broken. This was the Kardashian response to being asked by the @nytimes about my calling for transparency and responsibility in their extensive work to promote diet culture."
Later that day, she tweeted, "Essentially, 'fuck the young, impressionable people, or those struggling with eating disorders, we want the money.' I have been given these same opportunities to flog this stuff, and I don't do it, so they don't have to. Thank you, next." She added, "Their pockets are lined with the blood and diarrhea of teenage girls."
On April 2, Khloe deleted her Instagram post, prompting another tweet: "Oh look. Khloé deleted her diet shake post....There is hope after all..."
This small victory for Jamil comes after several other strongly worded takedowns of the Kardashians' glorification of diet culture. In May 2018, she criticized Kim for promoting appetite suppressing lollipops. "No. Fuck off. No," Jamil tweeted in response to the ads. "You are a terrible and toxic influence on young girls. I admire their mother's branding capabilities, she is an exploitative but innovative genius, however this family makes me feel actual despair over what women are reduced to."
She followed this with more posts and another tweet, advising Kim to "eat enough to fuel your BRAIN and work hard and be successful."
In an August 2018 interview with Channel 4 News, Jamil called the Kardashians "double agents for the patriarchy," stating that they're "selling us self-consciousness." She added, "The double agent for the patriarchy is basically just a woman who perhaps unknowingly is still putting the patriarchal narrative out into the world, is still benefiting off, profiting off and selling a patriarchal narrative to other women."
Jameela Jamil on banning airbrushing, the Kardashians and her traumatic teens www.youtube.com
A few months later, a fan Instagram account circulated a clip of Kendall telling Kim she was worried about her weight. "Like, you're so skinny," Kendall said, to which Kim replied, "Oh my god, thank you!" The interview was widely criticized for promoting anorexia, generating backlash from celebrities including Emmy Rossum and Stephanie Beatriz.
Emmy Rossum's post, via Entertainment Tonight
In response, Jamil posted a quote on Instagram that read, "How much did Florence Nightingale weigh when she founded modern nursing? How much did Rosa Parks weigh when she took a seat on that bus? How much did Malala Yousafzai weigh when she started writing about the lives of girls in Pakistan living under Taliban rule. You don't know? That's the right answer. Because it doesn't matter." She accompanied the post with the caption, "Dear the Kardashians. And every girl who looks to them for a reference of how to value themselves. follow @i_weigh for a dose of reality and self esteem."
"I Weigh" is the body positivity project that Jamil has been running since February 2018. It features hundreds of posts promoting body positivity and encourages people to judge their own worth based on who they are, not what they weigh.
It all started when Jamil posted a photo of herself, captioned "i weigh: lovely relationship / great friends / I laugh every day / I love my job / I make an honest living / I'm financially independent / I speak out for women's rights / I like my bingo wings / I like myself in spite of EVERYTHING I've been taught by the media / fucking KG."
The photo went viral, and later Jamil sparked a movement by reposting it alongside a call for others to follow her lead. "I'm fucking tired of seeing women just ignore what's amazing about them and their lives and their achievements, just because they don't have a bloody thigh gap," she wrote.
But Jamil didn't always have this level of confidence. Later in the podcast in which she called the Kardashians "double agents of the patriarchy," she spoke about how she suffered from anorexia throughout her youth until a period of recovery after a car crash forced her to gain weight and reevaluate her self-perception. "I am so, so aware of the damage the media does to a vulnerable mind, it ruined the first 20 years of my life," she wrote on her blog. "In this uprising of female power, we must realize we are being set absurd extra goals, thick and fast. The further we come as a gender, the more ridiculous the ideals we have to fulfill become. We are being distracted and exhausted and our eyes are being taken off the ball. Every minute you spend thinking about how thin or gorgeous you aren't is a minute you aren't spending on growing your life."
Naturally—it comes with the territory—Jamil has received some criticism of her own, especially for her own tendency to post beautiful photos of herself online. She's also been accused of putting down other women, an all-too-common phenomenon in a society that pits women against each other.
She certainly hasn't taken her eyes off the Kardashians; in January she came for Khloé again, this time to critique a post that read, "2 things a girl wants: 1) Lose weight. 2) Eat."
"This makes me sad," wrote Jamil. "I hope my daughter grows up wanting more than this. I want more than this. Sending love to this poor woman."
But Jamil has always been an advocate for women of all shapes, sizes, and backgrounds. If you reread her posts, she's actually never denounced the Kardashians' intelligence or capabilities, instead criticizing them only for their decision to promote dangerous products and body-shaming messages. Ironically, she even defended them on an early post on "I Weigh."
Overall, Jamil has become a heroine of sorts for legions of young girls—and people of all genders and ages—who are constantly overwhelmed by damaging pressures to look a certain way. These expectations are, of course, often created by advertising companies hungry to make a profit, regardless of the consequences of their actions; and they usually pander to heterosexual, patriarchal, and white supremacist norms.
Jamil is acutely aware of her mission's radical importance. "As a woman, being proud of yourself and believing you are *enough* as you are, is an act of social and political resistance," she once posted. If that's the case, her own work—not only believing in herself but inspiring others to do the same—is a full-on revolution.
Eden Arielle Gordon is a writer and musician from New York. Follow her on Twitter @edenarielmusic.
POP⚡DUST | Read More...
- Jameela Jamil vs Khloe Kardashian: Jamil calls for reality star to ... ›
- A brief history of Jameela Jamil and the Kardashians' differing views ... ›
- Jameela Jamil's Best Slams on Diet, Detox, Other Celebs ›
- Jameela Jamil Clarifies Criticism of Detox Tea Endorsers Cardi B ... ›
- Keeping Up With the Kardashian Cash Flow - The New York Times ›
- Jameela Jamil is right – the Kardashians are double agents for the ... ›
- Jameela Jamil's Response To Khloe Kardashian's Weight Loss ... ›
- Jameela Jamil Goes After Celebrities Promoting Diet Products ›
- Kim K's diet lollipop ad got dragged so bad, she took it down | Revelist ›
- Diet Culture, Jameela Jamil and Kim Kardashian: Double Agents of ... ›