Music Lists

8 Epic Rock Songs About U.S. Presidents

Rock and Roll has rarely connected with the Leader of the Free World.

Green Day - American Idiot [Official Music Video]

Rock and Roll has rarely connected with the Leader of the Free World.

Ronald Reagan had vehement disgust for the long-haired free-will rockers of the '80s, and an unprecedented number of musicians sent along cease and desist letters to Trump during his tumultuous four years.

Keep ReadingShow less
TV

The Obamas Announce New Netflix TV Shows Focusing on Disability Rights, Factory Workers, and Frederick Douglass

Their company, "Higher Ground Productions," just announced the names of the first eight series that it will be releasing.

The Obama family has shifted its focus from one of the most powerful venues in the real world—the White House—to one of the most powerful websites on the Internet: Netflix.

In 2018, the former president and first lady struck a multi-year deal with the platform that will allow them to reach 148 million subscribers, which is only a slight downgrade from the 327.2 million Americans that the president used to be responsible for.

This week, the family announced the first eight shows that will be produced for Netflix through their production company, Higher Ground Productions. Though they plan on avoiding any strictly political content related to the 2020 elections, the former president has emphasized that the films and shows that he and his wife choose to greenlight will still have purpose. "Touching on issues of race and class, democracy and civil rights and much more, we believe each of these productions won't just entertain but will educate, connect and inspire us all," he wrote in a statement.

Here are the shows that we know about so far:

  • "American Factory": This documentary, which won Best U.S. Documentary at the 2018 Sundance Film Festival, tells the story of a factory opened in Ohio by a Chinese billionaire in 2014. Higher Ground Productions stated that the film tells the story of "early days of hope and optimism give way to setbacks as high-tech China clashes with working-class America." Directed by Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert, it is slated to be the Obama production company's first release, though the release date is still TBA.
  • "Crip Camp": This documentary tells the story of the beginnings of the disability rights movement, focusing on the experiences of several teens in the 1970s at a camp for kids with disabilities located just down the road from Woodstock, New York. It's told from the perspective of Jim LeBrecht, who attended the camp as a child and directed and produced the film alongside Nicole Newham and Sarah Boulder.
  • "Listen to Your Vegetables and Eat Your Parents": This half-hour special for toddlers will focus on the origins of different foods from around the world. In traditional Michelle Obama fashion, it will promote healthy eating by taking "young children and their families around the globe on an adventure that tells us the story of our food."
  • "Bloom": This post-WWII drama tells the story of "barriers faced by women and by people of color in an era marked by hurdles but also tremendous progress." Taking place in New York in the 1950s, it will be produced by Calli Khouri, writer of Thelma and Louise.
  • "Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom": This documentary will be an adaption of the Pulitzer-prize winning biography by David W. Blight, which tells the story of Frederick Douglass's ascension from slavery to literacy to seminal Civil Rights speaker.
  • "Overlooked": This scripted anthology series, based on a New York Times initiative, will focus on the stories of "remarkable" people whose deaths were not originally reported by the newspaper, often due to racial bias.
  • "The Fifth Risk: Undoing Democracy": This series will adapt a book of the same name by Michael Lewis, which focuses on the transition of power from the Obama administration to the Trump administration. The book is an indictment of the lack of knowledge and carelessness with which the Trump administration has managed the United States. "The morning after Trump was elected president, the people who ran the US Department of Energy - an agency that deals with some of the most powerful risks facing humanity - waited to welcome the incoming administration's transition team. Nobody appeared. Across the US government, the same thing happened: nothing," reads its description. Though the Obamas seem to want to avoid political statements, any adaption of this book certainly seems poised to be a damning indictment of the current administration.

Though each project is different, they all swivel around the same fundamental purpose: creating unity by offering windows into different worldviews and fostering discussion the way only well-told stories can. "We created Higher Ground to harness the power of storytelling," said the former president. "That's why we couldn't be more excited about these projects."

Michelle Obama echoed her husband's sentiments, stating that "Barack and I have always believed in the power of storytelling to inspire us, to make us think differently about the world around us and to help us open our minds and hearts to others. Netflix's unparalleled service is a natural fit for the kinds of stories we want to share, and we look forward to starting this exciting new partnership." She added, "We love this slate because it spans so many different interests and experiences, yet it's all woven together with stories that are relevant to our daily lives. We think there's something here for everyone—moms and dads, curious kids, and anyone simply looking for an engaging, uplifting watch at the end of a busy day. We can't wait to see these projects come to life—and the conversations they'll generate."


Eden Arielle Gordon is a writer and musician from New York. Follow her on Twitter @edenarielmusic.


POP⚡DUST | Read More...

Woodstock 50 Has (Thankfully) Been Canceled

Game Of Thrones Recap: We're All Naming Our Future Daughters Arya

What Netflix's "Bonding" Gets Wrong About Sex Work

Culture News

Three Questions to Determine Whether You Should #FireTuckerCarlson

A handy guide to ruining someone's career over comments from ten years ago

Tucker Carlson

Richard Drew/AP/Shutterstock

Tucker Carlson has been dominating the most recent news cycle due to unearthed audio from his appearances on the "Bubba the Love Sponge Show" between 2006 and 2011.

These clips include uber-sexist comments referring to various women as "whores," racist comments referring to Iraqis as "semi-literate primitive monkeys," and Tucker's impassioned defense of a pedophile on the grounds that he married his child victim.

His advertisers have been dropping like flies, with his Monday show relying on direct-response ads and promos for other Fox News shows instead of national commercials. Fox News stands by him. And Tucker Carlson is decidedly not sorry.

While Tucker's description of his past words as "naughty" hardly begins to describe his defense of child abuse, his point on trying to destroy someone's career over decade-old comments might hold some water.

Should we be so fast to call for someone's proverbial head over something they said in the past?

Maybe. Here's a handy little guide for deciding.

Question 1. Were they serious?

As our collective social sensibilities shift over time, comedy does too. Adam Sandler movies used to be major theatrical releases; now they soft-launch on Netflix. From South Park to Family Guy to Superbad, everything that was once the height of popular comedy eventually loses its throne.

In the same vein, our senses of humor change as we mature. "Edgy humor" that passed as "funny" when we were kids in the 90s and early 2000s might no longer be so great in light of newfound social consciousness. And while not a good look, digging up a racist joke someone made when they were much younger does not necessarily mean they're a racist.

So when trying to decide whether or not to ruin someone's career over old comments, the question remains: were they serious?

1a. Yes

If yes, jump to Question 2.

1b. No

If no, they're still not off the hook just yet. Oftentimes "comedy" simply amounts to a humorous means of stating "the truth." So the real question isn't necessarily whether or not they were joking. It's "did they genuinely hold the sentiments they were the joking about?"

1ba. Yes

If yes, jump to Question 2.

1bb. No

If no, and you know the person was joking and does not hold the sentiments of the character they were playing during the joke, feel free to explain to them why their joke was upsetting or damaging. But there's no sense in ruining someone's career or livelihood over a sentiment they never even actually held.

Question 2. Do they still hold those views?

So let's say the person, whether serious or "joking," did genuinely hold the racist, sexist, or otherwise problematic views they expressed in the past. People change over time. People make mistakes. Viewpoints and belief systems are not necessarily static. Ignorance can be overcome through proper education and an open mind. As such, the person who made that comment ten years ago is not necessarily the same person in front of you now. So do they still hold those views?

2a. Yes

If the person you're dealing with still holds those views, attempt to explain why they're wrong. Many people's ignorant views have never been properly challenged. Give them the chance to see reason and comprehend the gravity of their words. Are they open to changing themselves?

2aa. Yes

Jump to Question 3.

2ab. No

If the person is truly unrepentant and stagnant in their damaging ideologies, go ahead and boycott them. There's no reason to support someone who thrives on racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.

2b. No

Jump to Question 3.

Question 3. Are they genuinely sorry?

Sometimes you hold an incorrect belief, someone points it out, and you change your mind. Oftentimes, you look back at your prior views, from long ago or even just the other day, and regret ever having held them. That's part of being human. Again, people are not static.

When someone is genuinely sorry for their past views and shows a willingness to change, that effort should be celebrated, not punished. That's not to say people shouldn't be held accountable for their past wrongdoings or that not being racist or sexist is some kind of accomplishment. Rather, it's to say that willingness to change is a sure sign of progress, and progress should always be encouraged. So are they actually sorry?

3a. Yes

Maybe someone said something problematic ten years ago, or maybe they said something problematic yesterday. If they're sorry, if they understand their error, if they truly try to change, let them. Don't ruin someone's life over an experience through which they're actively striving to grow.

3b. No

Or are they just sorry they got caught? If their apologies are hollow and they continue to hold their damaging sentiments and push those beliefs, screw 'em. Boycott away.

Ultimately, the choice of what people you want to support is up to you. This holds true for entertainment, business, and even your personal life. You are under no obligation to support anyone whose views and beliefs align with violence, damage, and degradation against yourself, your loved ones, your friends, or other people in general.

At the same time, it's important to recognize that people can grow and that growth is a core element of being human.

Of course, if someone doubles down on their sexism and racism and homophobia and defenses of pedophiles and child abusers, well, by all means, boycott all their sponsors and #FireTuckerCarlson.


Dan Kahan is a writer & screenwriter from Brooklyn, usually rocking a man bun. Find more at dankahanwriter.com



POP⚡DUST | Read More...

Down the Rabbit Hole: Exploring Weird YouTube

Fetishizing Autism: Representation in Hollywood

5 Romantic Movie Gestures That Are Actually Super Creepy