MUSIC

Cardi B and the Thin Line Between Feminism and Sexism

In the music industry, there's an incredibly thin line between feminist pride and sexist objectification. Cardi B has walked that line for a while.

Cardi B Cooks With Vogue

When record producer Jermaine Dupri name-dropped Cardi B in a tirade against female rappers, Cardi addressed his comments in a series of Instagram Live videos.

Dupri had criticised her and some of her peers, calling them "strippers rapping," and in the videos, Cardi B defended her work and former profession as expected.

But she also did more. While she defended her propensity for explicit content, she also implied that she only spends so much time talking about her genitalia because...it pays. With this admission, she was touching on a complicated double standard that has plagued women in the music industry for a long time.

Cardi B vs. Jermaine Dupri

When asked how he felt about contemporary rap stars like Cardi B, Nicki Minaj, and Megan Thee Stallion, Jermaine Dupri said, "I can't really say. I feel they're all rapping about the same thing. I don't think they're showing us who's the best rapper. For me, it's like strippers rapping and as far as rap goes I'm not getting who's the best." He added that he feels that at some point, female rappers are going to have to "talk about other things."

In her Instagram video response, Cardi said, "Okay guys I have seen a lot of people saying nowadays female rappers only talk about their p— and now that Jermaine Dupri brought it up I'm going to say something," she said. "First of all, I rap about my p— because she's my best friend and second of all it's because it seems like that's what people want to hear," she said. "When I did 'Be Careful' people was talking mad s— in the beginning like 'What the f— is this?' 'This is not what I was expecting.'"


"Be Careful" is one of Cardi B's songs that's about heartbreak, not sex. She clarified in the video that if her audiences wanted more content that wasn't sexual, she'd provide. "It's like if that's what people ain't trying to hear then I'm going to start rapping about my p— again," she said, adding that there are a lot of "female rappers who rap their asses off who don't talk about their p— and y'all don't support them. So don't blame that on us when y'all not the ones who are supporting them," she finished.

Basically, Cardi just said that she raps about sex so much because that's what sells.

Exploitation Designed as Feminism

In the music industry, there's an incredibly thin line between feminist pride and sexist objectification. Cardi's always toed that line, successfully pushing boundaries and building a cult of controversy around her.

In the past, female rappers and musicians who sang about sex and performed in a sexually provocative fashion were heavily criticized by feminists, seen as products of a music industry that profitted off selling women's bodies. This fad was partly the product of second-wave feminism, which railed against any and all stereotypes that seemed demeaning to women.

As feminism advanced, however, it became apparent that criticising women for their own choices was antithetical to women's liberation on the whole. This kind of criticism soon became known as slut-shaming; and since that theme's caught on, women who perform their hypersexuality of their own volition become celebrated and accepted.

To most, Cardi B fits into the camp of women who perform and own their aggressive sexualities. Therefore, she must be a feminist icon (even if a problematic one), right?

As her Instagram Live comments inadvertently reveal, Cardi B's decision to make hypersexuality a part of her image is not, actually, entirely her choice. Instead, it was dictated by the desires of consumers, revealing that once again, sex sells. Just like that, we're back to where we started so long ago: in a world where women perform their sexuality not because they want to, but because it makes money.

The writer Ariel Levy describes the roundabout way that exhibitionist sexuality disguised as feminism can quickly become nothing more than the very exploitation that feminism set out to destroy. This raunch culture, as she calls it, involves "[w]omen imagining that hotness of one particularly commercial mold is the highest achievement of womankind. Which," she concludes, "is essentially the perspective that people who we used to call male chauvinist pigs had." In essence, she's implying that when women feel pressured to perform their hypersexuality to express their autonomy or confidence, it's no better than men forcing them to do it.

The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy Returns

Hypersexuality is one of two main marketing platforms for female musicians. The other alternative is that of the Madonna—the virginal, pure, or motherly character who cloaks her sexuality and is therefore lovable. The whore, on the other hand, is f*ckable but not lovable. This is the textbook definition of the Madonna-Whore complex, an old binary that Sigmund Freud coined in order to explain why men feel like they can sleep with some women and fall in love with others, but not both.

Sometimes, the whore construct can be interchangeable with the tomboy archetype. Tomboy rappers like Roxanne Shanté and Salt-N-Pepa managed to escape sexual objectification by dressing and acting boyish. The same might be said for Billie Eilish and Princess Nokia today, both of whom favor baggy clothes and aggressive personas. Regardless of how powerful these women may be, it doesn't change the fact that they've built their careers around the patriarchy-built structure of the Madonna-whore complex.

And this complex has been especially hard for black women to shake off. In Western mythology and literature, black women have traditionally been equated with hypersexuality; and studies have shown that overall, black women are more sexually objectified than white women in today's world. Known as the Jezebel stereotype, this view of black women as sex objects is an offshoot of the age-old tradition by which white people dehumanize other races in order to justify marginalizing or otherwise harming them. Therefore, black women have had little opportunity to perform the Madonna: they're only palatable to white audiences when they comply with oversexualized stereotypes.

There are plenty of other examples of this dichotomy presenting itself in artists' marketing strategies. The point is: the Madonna-Whore dichotomy is always, always destructive, because it locks women into archetypes, and ignores the fact that most women are both, not one or the other.

Divides that separate women into either virginal angels or whores defined exclusively by their sexualities erase women's complexity and individuality. When female artists are criticized for being "strippers," this is no better than when women are ignored because they don't fulfill sexual fantasies or align with patriarchal, white/Western norms.

The ideal future for women in the music industry would be one where women can rap or sing about whatever they want to without judgment. Of course, in an industry driven by money, this might be difficult to achieve: But at least by becoming aware of the stereotypes that lock women into certain roles, we can make more of a conscious effort to support artists for being who they are, rather than criticizing them for conforming (or failing to conform) to rigid and flat-out stupid archetypes.

Still a Feminist

Cardi might be playing into the Madonna-Whore game, pandering to the desires and expectations of her fans, but she is still definively a feminist. Nothing shows this more clearly than the honesty she displayed in her Instagram Live videos.

In her first video, she clarified that she does love talking about her sexuality and her anatomy—while also declaring that they don't define her. She has other sides and angles; she's just not choosing to highlight them. Her main priority is making money, something she's always been straight-up about. Capitalism's incompatibility with feminism aside, she can't exactly be blamed for wanting success.

Her second Instagram response to Dupri also embodies the best of feminism, because she didn't simply defend her own image. She used her platform to uplift other female artists who she believes are deserving of more recognition. Citing rappers like Tierra Whack, Oranicuhh, and Kamiyah, she implored listeners to pay more attention to female rappers whose work doesn't revolve around their sexualities. "I feel we need to put these girls in more magazines and blogs. Radio DJs play these girls," she stated.

Tierra Whack - Whack World (Official Video)www.youtube.com

Cardi B didn't just walk the line between objectification and liberation with these videos. She annihilated it, reclaiming both as her own. Still, she's not a perfect feminist; because this doesn't change the fact that she's clearly using her sexuality to make a profit, possibly against her own true desires.

In the end, though, no one woman can be the perfect feminist. No woman should be expected to be one, either—because no woman is just one thing.

So, in conclusion, we shouldn't be judging Cardi B for choosing to perform her sexuality because it sells. However, we should be aware of the stereotypes that profit off the marginalization and division of women. We should, as Cardi B said, make an effort to listen to women of color who sing about things other than sexuality. We should question the roots of why we feel adoration or dislike for certain performers, and we should make an effort to judge women for things other than their appearance. We should question marketing platforms and overarching capitalist structures that make profit by dividing women into Madonnas or whores, while not demonizing individual women for personifying these archetypes.

So much of our tastes are collectively shaped by old stereotypes rooted in patriarchy, capitalism, or whiteness, to name a few of the categories that control a great deal of our world. Though we may never be able to totally escape these stereotypes, by slowly becoming aware of them—and by listening to women when they say we need to view women as whole human beings, not just body parts—we can start moving away from their stranglehold.

MUSIC

Cardi B's "Press" Video Implies That Her Felony Charges Were a Publicity Stunt

Was Cardi B's 2018 assault a meticulously preplanned publicity stunt?

Cardi B

David Fisher/Shutterstock

On Friday, June 21, Cardi B entered a courtroom.

She wore a black pantsuit with pink lapels and high heels; her gleaming hair fell around her face in straight lines. She proceeded to plead not guilty to felony charges that stemmed from a 2018 fight in a strip club in Queens.

Five days later, she dropped the video for her song "Press," which also finds her in a courtroom. Dressed in a white suit with an extravagant neck ruff, she delivers the kind of searing verses that made her famous while a white man screams at her—until he starts bleeding from the neck. Carnage ensues.

Cardi B - Press [Official Music Video]www.youtube.com

Though the line between Cardi B's life and her art has always been blurred, the "Press" video erases that division entirely. The fact that the video so clearly parallels real events—along with the fact that Cardi refused to plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge that would've almost certainly gotten her no jail time—raises the question: Was Cardi B's decision to refuse to plead guilty just a publicity stunt?

After all, even the fact that news of Cardi B's felony charge and court date broke in the same week as this video's release hints at some sort of premeditation. Even more suspicious: The assault in question was apparently preplanned as well. According to her felony indictment, "The defendant used social media accounts to communicate and coordinate the date, time, location, and target of a planned assault. Tawana Jackson-Motel and Belcalis Almanzar discussed payment of money in exchange for the commission for a planned assault. Jeffrey Bush prepared to video record the assault." In light of this, if convicted, Cardi faces up to 4 years in prison. It seems like all this might be a kind of experimental art piece, or maybe one of the more complicated and risky marketing campaigns in recent memory.

Cardi B Surrenders to Police in Strip Club Fightwww.youtube.com

All this makes for a lot of media coverage, which is exactly what the ever-antagonistic Cardi B shouts that she doesn't need in "Press." The video finds its star completely in charge, declaring that she doesn't need any press or anyone at all to back her up as she ascends to the top.

Regardless of its messages, the video is a powerful visual counterpart to an already fantastic song. It's clearly designed to raise eyebrows: Beginning with a woman-on-woman kiss, featuring literally the maximum amount of nudity as YouTube's censors will allow, punctuated by gunshots, and bloodstained from beginning to end, it's a slideshow of Hollywood's most eye-catching pleasures but with a twist. For once, it's a woman pulling the trigger.

Like much of Cardi B's career, her new video and the possible publicity stunt surrounding its release are simultaneously empowering and destructive, magnetic and also undeniably messy. "Press" is full of mixed messages. She kills the white lawyers and jury who spew silent words of rage at her, which could be a pointed jab at the racial bias that leads to the mass incarceration of people of color; but later in the video, she seems to kill all the female dancers around her, backtracking on any themes of solidarity. In the end, there's only one clear point: This is all about the cult of Cardi B.

In some ways, Cardi acts as a kind of Lilith figure in the video—Lilith being the most notorious demon in Judaism. As the story goes, Lilith was Adam's first wife in the garden of Eden, but after refusing to submit to her husband's sexual requests, she wound up fleeing and embarking on a murderous rampage. In modern times, Lilith has been reclaimed as a feminist icon, an embodiment of the aggressive sexuality, freedom, and unassailable dominance that women are rarely given the tools to manifest, but which comprise the legacies of most of history's so-called "great men."

Like Lilith, Cardi B abdicates her role within the system and fights fire with fire in "Press." In that spirit, her possibly preplanned arrest may be a f**k-you to the criminal justice system, to white male-led hegemonies, and to the media at large. But it's not an ode to politically correct liberals, either, not exactly a feminist anthem. Ultimately, it's a battle cry, a declaration of independence at a distorted and violent moment in American history The point is clear: Cardi B isn't going to stop wreaking havoc, and we're not going to stop watching.

MUSIC

Cardi B and Offset Reference Kim K and Beyoncé in Steamy New Video “Clout”

In their newest release, hip hop's stormiest couple takes down their haters and copycats while relishing in their own infamy.

MediaPunch/Shutterstock

Cardi B and Offset are probably most famous for their tumultuous relationship, but they're also pretty good at collaborating musically.

Their newest video, "Clout," is kitschy opulence at its finest. It features Offset at a neon yellow piano wearing a hockey mask alongside shots of the couple clad in leather and looking spectacular in a chamber of mirrors. Ultimately it's a no-holds-barred tribute to the electric draw and absurdity of money and fame.

Lyrically, the song is loaded with references to pop culture's most widely discussed icons; Kim Kardashian, Beyoncé, Kanye West, and Elvis are just some of the names that crop up in Offset's verses. Cardi B mentions Destiny's Child and oddly, Oscar the Grouch, but mostly focuses on the Internet's culture of defamation. "They using my name for clickbait," she sings, calling out all her wannabes and copycats in her characteristically effortless bars. "Saying anything to get a response."

Ultimately "Clout" takes both a critical look at the harsh competition and desperation that defines the come-up in this day and age—while also pandering to everything necessary to achieve that fame. "Do anything for clout," Cardi B spits while gyrating on her husband's lap in a very NSFW sequence and addressing the camera from within a hill of lemons. Aesthetically, the video is all 90's Busta Rhymes-style block colors; sonically it's surprisingly restrained, allowing all the focus to remain on the stars themselves.

"Clout" is Cardi B and Offset's fifth collaboration, their first since Lil Yachty's "Who Want the Smoke?" Watch it below:

Offset - Clout feat. Cardi B (Official Music Video)www.youtube.com

by Fitzcrittle

In the wake of the sexual abuse charges made against high profile men, documented in Surviving R. Kelly and the harrowingly detailed HBO documentary Leaving Neverland – in which two men claim to have been sexually assaulted by Michael Jackson when they were children – fans, media outlets, and the general public are left to answer some very difficult questions.

Firstly, do we submit to cancel culture, write off these important musical figures, and censor their respective catalogs? Secondly, does our reluctance to do so make us insensitive to victims of abuse? Lastly, how do we reconcile the talent of these artists with their crimes, particularly in cases like Jackson's, where the artist is no longer here to either defend or redeem himself?

These questions are particularly difficult in the wake of the #MeToo movement, which helped to return a sense of empowerment to victims of sexual abuse. The result was a swift and widespread execution of vigilante social justice. The movement was a necessary step in the right direction toward greater equality and, hopefully, fewer abuses of power, but it also played a role in cancel culture's ability to thrive — largely without question.

Historically speaking, artists haven't always been great people. Pablo Picasso was notoriously misogynistic, Lewis Carroll, who gave us Alice in Wonderland, was rumored to be a pedophile, and the legendary composer of the Romantic period, Richard Wagner, was viciously anti-Semitic. But if these people had been banished for their demons, the whole world would be deprived of their art.

There seems to be a direct correlation, however, between the amount of talent and influence an artist possesses, and the public's willingness to "cancel" them. Rumors surrounding MJ being a pedophile, for example, were in circulation long before his death, yet many fans spent years dismissing them due to "alack of sufficient evidence." The same is true of R. Kelly, who was given a second chance by the public in the wake of charges that he made child pornography in 2001 and 2002. Conversely, Offset came close to being canceled by the Twittersphere for cheating on Cardi B. Could this be because, in comparison to pioneers like Kelly and Jackson, Offset is less important to America's musical identity?

Alexis Petridis of The Guardiansaid of this phenomenon in regards to Michael Jackson: "You can't easily eradicate Jackson from history: too many people have too much of their lives bound up with his music. And perhaps you shouldn't. Perhaps it is all right that his music continues to be heard, so long as it comes with a caveat: that it reminds us great art can be made by terrible people, that talent can be weaponised in the most appalling way, that believing an artist automatically embodies goodness because we like their work is a dreadful mistake that can have awful consequences."

So maybe it is possible for us to condemn an artist's actions while also continuing to appreciate his art. If we are to decide that Michael Jackson and R. Kelly have contributed enough musically to warrant continuous airplay, it will be a testament to the power of their music, not to who they were as people. Their songs may take on different – perhaps darker – meanings and their lyrics may become more complicated by historical context, but isn't that a good thing? Shouldn't art be complicated, messy, and difficult to grapple with? While there is an argument to be made for boycotting Kelly's music to prevent him from reaping the profits of continual streams and record purchases, Jackson, for one, is no longer making money off his music. So, what is our incentive to banish his songs? Who are we punishing?

Maybe Jackson's legacy can be as instructional and cautionary as it is toxic and painful. It's possible that we have more to lose by trying to bury our offenders than by confronting them head on, coming to terms with what happened, directly discussing the problems, and, hopefully, healing in the process.

At the end of his Grammy award-winning standup special, The Age of Spin, Dave Chapelle demonstrates what this more complicated view of a public figure could look like. While acknowledging Bill Cosby's simultaneous importance to the Black community and his abhorrent actions, Chapelle says, "The point is this: He rapes, but he saves. And he saves more than he rapes … but he probably does rape."

Here, Chapelle gives us something of a roadmap for acknowledging that a man can be a monster and an important cultural influence, all at once. That beauty, again, will and should never make up for, soften, or redeem the heinous acts that Cosby (or anyone) has committed, but that beauty still does exist alongside, and separate from, the hideous things he's done.

Simply shunning artists like MJ or Kelly out of mainstream consciousness does not erase the art which outlives their public favor. If anything, it just makes it easier for us to ignore serious issues. Nobody is asking you to support a particular artist if you find it unconscionable, but consider this: For every person who is offended by hearing a Michael Jackson song, there are 10 who find it transcendent, are transported by it, or even feel healed of their own traumas.

Perhaps, moving forward, we can approach both the artist and his art with a heightened level of nuance that art intrinsically demands. To what ends do we believe that justice can truly be served, after all, if sincere redemption is impossible from the start? Maybe a man can be admonished, and his art can be admired, all in a single breath.

Cardi B

David Fisher/Shutterstock

Everyone can breathe a sigh of relief: hip-hop's most dramatic couple is back together.

Sources have confirmed to TMZ that Cardi B and husband Offset are not getting a divorce after all. According to TMZ, "Cardi's returning to the Atlanta home they shared before the breakup. We're told this is the first time she's been back to stay there with Offset and Kulture since December."

Prior to the news of the reunion, fans had already begun to suspect a reconciliation was on the way after Cardi posted "I wanna go home" over a picture of Offset and daughter Kulture on her Instagram story.

While sources say the couple is definitively back together, there are reportedly a few ground rules in place to prevent recurrences of Offset's unfaithful behavior. The Migos rapper has changed his phone number and is only using it for business and communicating with Cardi. He's also abiding by a "no groupies" rule, particularly this weekend at the Super Bowl where no female fans will be allowed near him.

He has a lot to prove to his wife after his infidelities went public in late 2018. While there were many alleged incidents of Offset being unfaithful, the incident that likely drove Cardi B to end the relationship was the leaked text messages between Offset and rapper Summer Bunni, in which Offset seemed to be attempting to plan a threesome with her and Cuban Doll. But Offset didn't take the break up well, attempting to win Cardi back multiple times, even going so far as to interrupt her concert to apologize, efforts that seem to have now paid off.

Whether the events surrounding the split was a publicity stunt for Offset's upcoming album or a genuine rift, it looks like baby Kulture has both her parents under one roof once again.


Brooke Ivey Johnson is a Brooklyn based writer, playwright, and human woman. To read more of her work visit her blog or follow her twitter @BrookeIJohnson.


POP⚡DUST | Read More...

10 Dos and Don'ts to Surviving Reboots in 2019

Ariana Grande's Japanese Tattoo Is Too Funny To Be Cultural Appropriation

Something's Rotten in the House of Drew: Justin Bieber Starts a Cult

Cardi B

Photo by David Fisher (Shutterstock)

As you probably already know, Offset and Cardi B recently split after rumors of the Migos rapper's infidelities went public.

Keep ReadingShow less