When politics become entertainment, where does that leave our morality?
Imagine yourself adrift in a sea of pasty, screaming faces.
A sweaty WWE guy is shouting inflammatory rhetoric as the crowd cheers wildly at his every word. One guy body slams another guy. As the aggressor is dragged off by security, the crowd jeers, "LET HIM GO! LET HIM GO!" Where are you?
If you said, "a WWE show, obviously," sorry, you're wrong. The correct answer is a Donald Trump rally.
To be clear, Donald Trump is the WWE guy, one of his supporters really did body slam a BBC cameraman, and the crazed crowd really did love it.
Trump supporter shoves BBC cameraman - BBC News www.youtube.com
WWE storylines revolve around faces (heroes) and heels (villains), all of whom are involved in an interweaving character drama that blurs the line between fiction and reality. Wrestlers take on larger-than-life personas who deal with romance, friendship, rivalry, personal growth, honor, and even death onstage, usually through combat. WWE storylines, and the spectacles of violence involved, offer catharsis to viewers. In the real world, most problems can't be solved so simply.
As a result, viewers all over the world delight in watching honed athletes bring these fictional scenarios to life. A great WWE performance allows you to cheer for violent solutions to relatable problems, with the caveat of knowing that the violence isn't "real" and that while the wrestlers might sustain injuries, they're professionals performing consensually. In other words, the blood-thirst displayed by a WWE crowd makes perfect sense because the medium is a form of entertainment and escapism. It isn't real.
In the real world, problems aren't black and white. There aren't heroes and villains. There are just people. To approach politics in the way one would approach the WWE is to fundamentally reject civilized society—it is an embrace of fascism. Which is why it's so terrifying that Trump supporters seem to approach his rallies in this capacity.
Of course, for most people, physically attacking an innocent civilian just doing his job would be an egregious offense. Even if you might disagree with the company that person works for, you recognize that they're another person and you can't solve your problems through violence. But for the attendees of Trump's campaign rally in El Paso, Texas, an unprovoked attack on a camera man was cause for celebration. Perhaps it isn't a surprising turn for a rally characterized by jingoistic chants of "USA, USA!" and screeds against enemies, mostly domestic, to take. Still, one would hope that physical violence might give the crowd pause.
But, apparently, Trump's ongoing crusade against journalists has been a wild success. His supporters don't just disbelieve the "fake news media," they outright hate and dehumanize media workers. What other justification could there possibly be for cheering at an unprovoked assault?
Much like a WWE event, Trump rally attendees seem to be fueled by bloodlust and hatred; they seem to view politics as a form of entertainment with clear winners and losers where they can express their aggression through the bashing of perceived enemies.
Except unlike the WWE, the enemies aren't fictional villains. They're unwilling participants, usually women, minorities, and political opponents painted in broad strokes by the ultimate real-world heel: the President of the United States. And the attendees of these rallies aren't proponents of any particular social cause or public policy, they're there to release aggression against an imagined enemy in the form of their own countrymen.
How does one distinguish this fervor and bloodthirst from Nazism? What distinguishes Trump supporters cheering for an attack on journalists from German citizens cheering for the eradication of the Jews? The current fervor among right wing Americans hasn't quite reached a "Blood and Soil" fever pitch yet, but then again, the Nuremberg Laws weren't written overnight. Fascism moves in baby steps, and America is just starting to waddle.
POP⚡DUST | Read More...
- BBC cameraman shoved and abused at Trump rally in El Paso ... ›
- Trump supporter attacks BBC cameraman at El Paso rally - BBC News ›
- BBC Seeks Review Of Trump Rally Security After Cameraman ... ›
- BBC cameraman 'violently attacked' during Trump rally | US News ... ›
- Why the attack on our cameraman was no surprise - BBC News ›
- BBC cameraman assaulted during Trump rally in El Paso - Vox ›
- Trump El Paso rally: Supporter shoves BBC cameraman - BBC News ›
- BBC cameraman at Trump rally attacked by man in MAGA hat in El ... ›
- UK foreign secretary condemns attack on BBC cameraman at Trump ... ›
- BBC cameraman attack shows Trump's anti-media speech has been ... ›
- BBC Cameraman Is Attacked at Trump Rally - The New York Times ›
- Trump Supporter Violently Shoves BBC Cameraman At Rally In El ... ›
Animation is lame and live-action is awesome.
Everybody loves Disney live-action remakes.
In a world plagued by racism, disease, and a seemingly endless bounty of spiraling misfortune, at least we can all agree that Disney knocks it out of the park every time they dredge up an old, animated movie for a live-action makeover because cartoons are for babies.
Sure, some of us thought the original Beauty and the Beast was fine, but could lame, 2D Belle ever hold a candle to 3D Emma Watson? And yeah, the original Lion King was okay, I guess, but there's nobody in the world who preferred cartoon Scar's rendition of "Be Prepared" to the incredible feat of getting a real lion to sing it in the live-action remake.
Being a Disney fan can be hard sometimes, as you have fond memories of beloved childhood movies but also don't want people to make fun of you for liking cartoons. That's why, out of all the corporations in the world, Disney is undoubtedly the most selfless, willing to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to bring their old, outdated movies into the modern age—all for the fans.
After Halle Berry walked back her consideration of playing a transgender character, we look back at how Hollywood has repeatedly fumbled trans representation.
Halle Berry has made headlines this week after turning down a role in which, had she gone through with production, would have represented a transgender man.
Berry, an Academy Award-winning actress known for roles in films like Monster's Ball, Catwoman, and Gothika, took to Twitter Monday night to apologize for considering the role. "Over the weekend I had the opportunity to discuss my consideration of an upcoming role as a transgender man, and I"d like to apologize for those remarks," Berry wrote. "As a cisgender woman, I now understand that I should not have considered this role, and that the transgender community should undeniably have the opportunity to tell their own stories."
The post continued: "I am grateful for the guidance and critical conversation over the past few days and I will continue to listen, educate and learn from this mistake. I vow to be an ally in using my voice to promote better representation on-screen, both in front of and behind the camera."