It's like they aren't even trying to glow up at all.
It's like the Grammys aren't even trying to glow up at all. After using her image on billboards and heavily touting her performance at Sunday's event, The Grammy Awards have lost Ariana Grande as both a performer and an attendee. According to Variety, a dispute arose between producers and Grande, who is nominated for two awards at the ceremony, over the pop star's setlist. An unnamed source told the magazine that Grande was "insulted" when producers initially refused to let her perform her latest single, "7 Rings." They had reached an agreement once producers relented and agreed that the song could be included in a medley, but fell apart again once they insisted that they choose the rest of the songs in the performance.
It's certainly a...choice for Grammy producers to deny one of today's most famous artists the opportunity to perform whatever song she wants—especially when that song is currently number one on Billboard's Hot 100, and has been since it was released two weeks ago. Producers undoubtedly knew that booking Grande to perform would be a big draw for viewers, especially with the release of her latest album, Sweetener, set for just two days before the event. That much is clear from the use of Grande's image and news of her performance in their ads for Sunday's broadcast.
Let's Hear It | 61st GRAMMY Awards youtu.be
Some are comparing Grande dropping out to Lorde declining to participate in a group tribute to Tom Petty at the 2018 ceremony after being the only woman nominated in her category and the only nominee who was not offered a solo performance. (Grande has often publicly lamented double-standards set for women in the music industry.) The Recording Academy, which is the governing body for the Grammy Awards, faced criticism after the 2018 ceremony for a very low number of female nominees and comments from the organization president attributing the gender disparity to women needing to "step up," rather than outdated membership models and inclusion or nomination criteria that inherently favored male artists, engineers, and songwriters. The Academy seemed to be taking a step in the right direction by adjusting their nomination and membership policies under the guidance of Diversity and Inclusion Task Force, which is why the decision to deny Grande autonomy over her performance is especially disappointing.
It's also worth noting that the Grammys broadcast is in the unique position of being able to showcase more of the work that it's celebrating than any other industry awards show. It's not possible to give an audience a true sense of an entire film, TV show, or stage performance unless they've seen it. A performance at a music awards show, however, is probably the closest a viewer can get to a complete picture of the work before a winner is announced, and it's the easiest way to bring entertainment to an event that could easily feel stuffy and self-congratulating. After last year's event pulled in the lowest ratings in almost a decade, it seems especially unwise for producers to object to a performance of the current most popular song in the country.
Neither Grande nor the Grammys have spoken publicly about the canceled performance. But maybe the Grammys aren't even worried about ratings. After all, they've still got the universally popular and highly-anticipated collaboration between Post Malone and the Red Hot Chili Peppers and the newly announced and very obvious, not-at-all confusing Jennifer Lopez tribute to Motown.
I have questions. https://t.co/UqkqAZzRV5— Jemele Hill (@Jemele Hill)1549394400.0
Y’all really want to make this the worst Black History Month ever, huh? https://t.co/XnY7U5WRzO— Sage Against The Machine (@Sage Against The Machine)1549394340.0
The Grammys will air live on Sunday, February 10 at 8pm.
Rebecca Linde is a writer and cultural critic in NYC. She tweets about pop culture and television @rklinde.
POP ⚡DUST | Read More…
- Ariana Grande pulls out of Grammy Awards performance and will ... ›
- Ariana Grande pulls out of performing AND attending the Grammy's ... ›
- Ariana Grande Is Pulling Out of the Grammys After Being "Insulted" ›
- Ariana Grande Pulls Out Of Grammys After Disagreement With ... ›
- Why Ariana Grande has reportedly pulled out of the Grammys ›
- Ariana Grande Pulls Out of Grammys Performance: Variety ›
- Ariana Grande reportedly pulls out of Grammys ceremony over ... ›
- Ariana Grande No Longer Attending the Grammys After Producer ... ›
In the opening pages of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Earth is destroyed. Now if that doesn't scream 2020 so far, what does?
In Douglas Adams's 1979 novel, which premiered as a radio series on BBC Radio4 in 1978 (42 years ago—but more about the significance of that number later), Earth is suddenly blown up in order to make room for an intergalactic superhighway. Now, in a year that has—after only 3 months, people—given us a contentious, confusing democratic primary, the death of Kobe Bryant, new and worsening facts about our climate and habitat at large, appalling leadership, and of course the rapid spread of and global shutdowns by the coronavirus (COVID-19), it seems impossible to turn to any source for comfort.
Enter The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: a novel that starts with the global annihilation that we might be heading for and then follows the characters as they cope with new realities, with isolation and loss, an endless information source that brings with it endless anxiety, and an egomaniacal, arrogant, selfish, attention-craving president of the galaxy.
- 11 Books That Changed Celebrities' Lives - Popdust ›
- Best Books to Read While Quarantined - Popdust ›
- Donald Trump's Reading List - Popdust ›
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Adams, Douglas ... ›
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2005) - IMDb ›
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - BBC Radio 4 ›
- Of mice and spacemen - “The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy ... ›
- Don't panic! The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is back | Television ... ›
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: 40 years of parody and ... ›
It's time to study.
Now that you've flooded Instagram with photos of black squares, it's time to hunker down for some real activism.
If you're a white person, you're sitting on top of about four centuries of institutionalized racism. In the wake of George Floyd's murder by police and countless Black Lives Matter protests across the nation, it's time to show up—with your body, with your voice, and with your brain.